Quote:
Originally Posted by archimedes11
It depends on the topic I guess. If his speeches thus far are any indication, he'll be slaughtered when it comes to intelligent debates over immigration and foreign policy. For example, when he presents his "plan" for dealing with the Islamic State, I've only ever heard him (repeatedly) say something to the effect of:
"I'll hit 'em hard. Nobody will hit 'em harder than me! NOBODY!"
Which, for anyone out there who hasn't already realized it, is absolutely empty rhetoric completely devoid of substance. I think much of the reason that he's enjoying this (temporary) success in the polls is because he offers appealingly simple solutions to complicated questions, which naturally none of his supporters are informed or educated enough about to be able to comprehend themselves and so can't call him out on his bull****.
Thanks for the response, good post. The question for me is are his debate opponents up to the task of convincing Republican primary voters that their ideas are better via intelligent answers/presentations? It seems to me that if the Republican primary voters are dominated by a bunch of clueless idiots then intelligent, well thought out arguments in resolving complex issues will be completely lost on them.
I've been making the case in a round about way that many of Trump's opponents are actually not up to the task of at least presenting cogent arguments on the complex issues you refer to in order to contrast Trump positions. Jeb Bush would be one of those opponents that are not capable, Rick Perry is another. Chris Christie, John Kasich, and Carly Fiorina could do that I think but I'm not sure any of them are in the upcoming debate.
Last edited by adios; 07-26-2015 at 12:10 PM.