Open eugenics supporters are a dying breed.

He just wants poor people to die off thanks to capitalism.

I'm sure his imaginary investment banker friends agree with him.

Also, I'm sure he and jibbly puff have a similar idea of who make up the "poor" class

I think it's okay to discuss because while we are able to look down on that idea being implemented by design, and few people in our society could really stomach watching so many poor people dying off in the street or another holocaust only larger, or some other sick event that is required to successfully see the human race "benefit" from euginics, we seem to not be as upset with it happening elsewhere, away from our gaze, like in Africa or other poverty stricken regions. Overpopulation of this planet and the resulting more natural form of eugenics is an ugly elephant in the room that causes a ton of guilt in my mind, or maybe helplessness is a better term.

Isn't that version of eugenics passive, like it's just gonna happen because of freedom and property, so let it?

The effect is the same, only it's easier to justify "passively" letting it happen because it's outside our borders, so they're not within our system of management. Inside our country we give them assistence to prevent having to watch them suffering and dying en masse. The main way I manage the guilt for the rest of the world's poverty is that I see no solution that makes any difference in the long term. Helping them set up better systems of government with better education looks like the best course, and we're doing that.

Ideas such as eugenics, which support things like the holocaust are not very meaningfully rated on the passive/active scale. Eventually over time, if ideas are widely believed, they are acted upon. It's more important to consider the fallacious nature of the idea and how it has been used historically.

Eugenics is always about enforcing a particular social order. The same things Goodman is saying about "dullards" proxy was what was said about Jews in Germany. The obvious fact that Jews thrived in Germany was no detraction from the eugenics campaign because it was always about pseudo scientific rationalizations towards instituting a particular social order, and that was understood.

This is all true, except for the part about voter Id not being inherently racist, because it totally is.

Wrong Prince. Prince Andrew is implicated. He's the queens youngest son, Prince Charles brother and allegedly Prince Harry's uncle.

/ euro privilege

Yeah I realized that error after it was too late. Now I can't pretend nobody saw it.

I guess you're using "inherent" the same way the kids these days use 'literally"?

"
inherent
[in-heer-uh nt, -her-]

Synonyms
Examples
Word Origin

adjective
1.
existing in someone or something as a permanent and inseparable element, quality, or attribute; "


Nuuuuuupe, the republican introduced voter id laws are inherently racist.

Inherent and explicit are two different things

If they provided picture IDs free of charge to all voters would it still be racist in effect?

I think your question is more about the definition of "voter ID" than it is "inherent". Used as the avg poster does- I think master's point holds up.

you'll never take me alive

What was this thread about again?

It's a business decision. THis website looks bad if people look at the 'new posts' tab and find a bunch of threads that belong on stormfront. You might like it there actually.

Diversity is an intrinsic attribute of all life. Humans by virtue of being unique individuals are the epitome of this nature.

I do enjoy the racist fear-mongering about diversity. Lol absurdity is telling you something patently true is false BE AFRAID NOT!

Well you got one thing right in that post.

I wonder if this guy knows how easy it is for me to delete posts?

Dude, I get that you're sad you can't talk about how bad diversity is here. But you can't. Go start your own forum.