BY MR. WISENBERG:

Q Mr. President, I want to, before I go into a new subject area,
briefly go over something you were talking about with Mr. Bittman.

The statement of your attorney, Mr. Bennett, at the Paula Jones
deposition, "Counsel is fully aware" -- it's page 54, line 5 ?
"Counsel is fully aware that Ms. Lewinsky has filed, has an affidavit
which they are in possession of saying that there is absolutely no sex
of any kind in any manner, shape or form, with President Clinton..

That statement is made by your attorney in front of Judge Susan Webber
Wright, correct?

A [Hilary's husband, and Democratic primary candidate for the Office of the First [First] "Spouse"] That's correct.

Q That statement is a completely false statement. Whether or not Mr.
Bennett knew of your relationship with Ms. Lewinsky, the statement
that there was "no sex of any kind in any manner, shape or form, with
President Clinton," was an utterly false statement. Is that correct?

A It depends on what the meaning of the word "is" is. If the ?if he ?
if "is" means is and never has been, that is not--- that is one thing.
If it means there is none, that was a completely true statement.

But, as I have testified, and I'd like to testify again, this is -- it
is somewhat unusual for a client to be asked about his lawyer's
statements, instead of the other way around. I was not paying a great
deal of attention to this exchange. I was focusing on my own
testimony.

And if you go back and look at the sequence of this, you will see that
the Jones lawyers decided that this was going to be the Lewinsky
deposition, not the Jones deposition. And, given the facts of their
case, I can understand why they made that decision. But that is not
how I prepared for it. That is not how I was thinking about it.

And I am not sure, Mr. Wisenberg, as I sit here today, that I sat
there and followed all these interchanges between the lawyers. I'm
quite sure that I didn't follow all the interchanges between the
lawyers all that carefully. And I don't really believe, therefore,
that I can say Mr. Bennett's testimony or statement is testimony and
is imputable to me. I didn't -- I don't know that I was even paying
that much attention to it.


...

"...don't forget that the accusation was not that Clinton had a
current affair with Monica, but that an affair did occur. Clinton's
lawyer was completely aware of that at the time of the statement so
either he was purposefully very misleading or outright lied in his
comments.

Clinton was also fully aware of this so he was either purposefully
very misleading or outright lied in his defense of his attorney's
statements. The definition of "is" was not in question because
everyone knew that the question at hand was a previous affair, not a
current affair. So Clinton was the only one trying to define "is"." -- jack_of_few_trades-ga

countdown until this is locked. No one is allowed to accuse the Clintons of wrongdoing on this board.

pretty much anyone capable of saying that in such circumstances gets my vote and so does their family.

Pfunk is furious someone somewhere has gotten a blowjob.

Explains all his moronic conspiracy nonsense on the subject in P.

Anyone have any ideas why this wasn't posted in Alta?

Anyone have any thoughts on why it shouldn't be deleted?

Why should it be deleted?

What is the point of the thread? An OP that hasn't much to do with the poll question and is fairly ancient history. Just a hatchet job against the Clintons.

It wasn't posted in alpha because ludicrous nonsense about politicians tends to get the poster banned

That's kind of what I was thinking. I'd rather PU wasn't the home of threads that couldn't make it in Alta because they are just awful. I'm ok with awful conspiracy threads; where would we be without the delightful lunacy of Proph, Deuces and Jiggs?

What's the point of this forum other than to give ****ty posters a soapbox? If you're going to let spank and company relentlessly **** on the carpet, I don't see why this guy can't have a post that's at least semi-politics related.

you post the most odd accusations.

is it because you have never had a blowjob? You should try it. Assuming that you are able to find a willing participant.

Lock this and re-open the David Cameron thread