Quote:
Originally Posted by 13ball
Wikileaks spread the pizzagate story, and pizzagate is false. Apparently you think it's okay to spread false rumors about actual people being pedophiles?
No, wikileaks did not spread the pizzagate story. Not at all, and the fact that you would assert that means you just have no commitment to the truth. Wikileaks published the email correspondence of John Pedesta. Some other people (the common belief is that it originated in 4chan or some message board), not in any way associated with Wikileaks, decided to apply their own analysis to the Podesta's emails and the bizarre behavior of his associates. The tweet you posted of wikileaks pointing to the press covering pizzagate is not Wikileaks spreading pizzagate. In fact, IIRC, what Wikileaks pointed to was a mainstream press giving credibility to pizzagate. Wikileaks has explicitly stated that they don't endorse the pizzagate conspiracy theory. At the same time, they do acknowledge that there is some bizarre **** going on in the emails. I think that is undeniable.
Quote:
You say "let's review the evidence"--and then don't mention ANY of the evidence. Amazing.
You cited the Crowdstrike report as the evidence of Russian hacking. I gave reasons why that evidence isn't credible, with citation. Do you want more citation? Do you question anything I posted? It seems like you are just saying I didn't discuss the evidence when I discussed the very thing you cite as evidence.
I know it is easier to just make things up than actually deal with the criticisms of the evidence. Like, I know it is difficult to explain why the DNC would not allow the FBI or DHS to inspect their servers. It's difficult for you, I mean, because you would have to reconcile it with your immovable presumption that Russia did the hacking and the DNC is honest. If you start with no presumptions, however, it's really not too difficult to explain the DNC's secrecy on the matter. Their behavior is consistent with only one motive - don't want the truth out.
Quote:
Funny how dip**** conspiracy theorists demand reams of evidence, yet believe that the DNC and Crowdstrike are fabricating reports with ZERO evidence to back it up.
Let's get one thing straight - you are promoting a conspiracy theory. You are saying Russia hacked the DNC and is in league with Trump and/or Wikileaks. You are saying this based on a privately funded investigation, the main claims of which had to be retracted because they were demonstrably false. So let's get another thing straight -
the crowdstrike report has been proven false.
The DNC is hiding the evidence from those who they don't influence directly, namely the FBI and DHS, because they want their assertions, not the evidence, to speak. This is so obvious that even a mainstream establishment dog like Jake Tapper has to say something.
https://twitter.com/jaketapper/statu...73197119004672
Quote:
Some of you are going to dislike hearing this but the DNC's inadequate response to FBI/DHS on 🇷🇺 hack is a legit question
You like tweets? Feast on that tweet, twit. Your own side is caving in, hitting their own teeth together after trying to chomp down on the big nothing burger. That means it's time for you to fold up shop too, sheeple. The herd is moving away from a lie which was unsustainable. Time to follow.