No ****ing ****, Sherlock. The rest of your post is utter off topic nonsense. Save the semi-coherent talking point regurgitation for the sharper posters, you're not good at it.

Ive yet to see a good post from you. Any links to your brilliance?

Hey, remember those "17 agencies"?

Seems like we're down to 4 - who have still never had their hands on any evidence of hacking.

I heard a rumor about thread is CNN memes?

I bet conservatives are mad that they didn't think of "fake news" as a dodge a long time ago. It makes lying so much easier and saves two, maybe three, syllables.

civilian agencies

Fake news isn't something you can just make up on your own.

Speaking of lying.

I've been saying that the allegations were propaganda and conspiratorial nonsense before even Trump supporters were sure, and I am one of the leftmost posters on this site. The real progressives (not those who are merely elitists who like to mouth liberal sentiments because it's a cheap way to assuage their own guilt) have been consistently critical of the Trump-Russia conspiracy nonsense. I think Trump is impeachable for other reasons, and I doubt all the faux liberals here will ever acknowledge the fault in allowing a false narrative, designed to deflect blame away from the woefully sorry state of the democratic party, to suck up so much anti-Trump oxygen.

The loyalty that these rats show to the DNC leadership is just despicable, unforgivable. Their only defense possible is that they have become so partisan as to physiologically lose the ability to think rationally. They are so embittered by the revolts against their elitist schemes that they can't even think straight. It was all supposed to come together. We saw numerous threads about the death of the republican party which were premised on that assumption, framed like watching a traffic accident unfold. Some of the commentary in those threads is no doubt valid, but the irony in their delight at what they thought was the republican demise is astounding. In fact, they were in midst of a bigger implosion and were completely clueless to it (smug as they are).

The democrats then proceeded to attempt to foist an evil person onto the world because it was owed to her, according to their patronage accounting. Never mind that this evil person was completely antithetical to everything the democrats claimed to stand for. Never mind that this evil person cheated in the democratic primary. Never mind that this evil person put the state department up for sale. No, she was owed, and what would be considerations for decent are barred from mention. Allegiance to power, not values, is the operating principle for the democratic party.

Imagine their surprise when all of their propaganda and media manipulation wasn't enough to distract people from what they know is vile. In fact, they were a victim of their own bias machine as the media was telling them up to the day of the election that HRC was in. Now, this Russia-Trump conspiracy nonsense is like the DNC temper-tantrum revenge.

Hillary is not the president and never will be and will likely never have any significant political power. So lets look over there and talk about her endlessly.

Weren't you supposed to smear Van Jones as a 9/11 truther here?

Alternatively, the DNC is a mostly powerless fundraising organization and most people don't really care that much.

When can we get to the real journalism of finding Batboy

Facts and truth never mattered to hu-mans. All that matters is how much confidence you can project when making proclamations. The PUA types were right all along, they just didn't realize that confidence tricks work even better when trying to influence men.

Let's be clear here. You are the conspiracy theorist. Russia hacked the DNC and Podesta. Whether Trump colluded with or sought help from Russian hackers. I can't say. But there is some evidence that Flynn might have been involved.

It's amusing that you think anybody cares about the leadership of the DNC.

So the "real progressive" is the one mindlessly repeating Republican talking points? I don't think so.

It's a wrassling match now, deploy special man'oovers.

Now CNN is threatening to dox the person who made the wrestling video.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/07/04/politi...eet/index.html

"CNN is not publishing "HanA**holeSolo's" name because he is a private citizen...

CNN reserves the right to publish his identity should any of that change."

As if a network with less credibility than the Enquirer could sink lower. Isn't the first rule of being in a hole to STOP DIGGING? Apparently they lost that memo.

I wonder what going through life must be like when you think repeating the same nonsense will eventually make it true

Almost interesting that you cherry-pick that one detail from the article and frame it as a threat to dox.

I'm sorry you don't know what doxing is, but that's not really my problem nor my job to educate you. But keep defending stupid **** like this, it will be good for your brand.

You're probably not sorry, I don't have a brand, and that still was not a threat to dox.

Why you framed it that way is still curious and now you have also aggro-defended the move. Well...

I agree that they should go ahead and publish the *******'s name.