Oh wow.

Some people will read Dids' post where he says "Wookie wasn't wrong" and reasonably conclude that Dids is saying Wookie wasn't wrong. And then some people will bold a few random snippets, claim it's Dids saying Wookie was wrong, and completely ignore the post where Dids actually wrote, directed to you, "Wookie wasn't wrong".

Rock on, YB, rock on.

OBVIOUS RACIST

So we just take people at their word and don't use their other posts to clarify what they actually think? Interesting.

You're quoting posts from 12:54pm to piece together a suspect argument that Dids told you straight up was wrong at 1:20pm. Like, if only there was a way that in response to your suspicions, Dids could tell you exactly how he felt...oh wait, HE DID.

Jesus you're terrible at the internet.

Couple of things:

1) Mother****er you never cared. What makes you think you can guess at the motivations of those who did?

2) For example, Jesus we all know racists are stupid, but what the **** is up with them just straight up making **** up about the events of a year ago? PEOPLE CARED BEFORE THE EDITED 911 CALL. We've gone over this repeatedly. I know your parents handicapped you with your genetics and your upbringing but I'm damn sure they taught you how to read a ****ing calendar.

3) Also what kind of tautological bull**** is this? "Derp it wasn't a story until the media reported on it". Uh, yes, that is how that works. The media informs people about the goings on. That is literally the only reason the news media exists.

You're wrong and I am right. That's exactly how I feel, can't be proven wrong!

Your Boss- Would you say that your incisive cross examination of Wookie's missing qualifier in his correct but imprecise post is the greatest achievement in the history of your trailer park? I mean, you sure showed up that fancy talking librul but good there.

If you want to accuse Dids of lying then ****ing do it, don't sit there like a pussy and dance around him telling you you're wrong.

No doubt. I printed it out and put it on the door of my refrigerator.

Lying is a strong word. I think he's wrong about thinking that he didn't say Wookie was wrong when he pointed out how wrong Wookies post was.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/contentious

2: exhibiting an often perverse and wearisome tendency to quarrels and disputes <a man of a most contentious nature>

YB,

What you seem to be missing, and the point I think I pretty carefully made, is that Wookie's post is totally fine within the context of the ongoing conversation. He's not trying to make an absolute statement, he's explaining how one thing is different from another thing. They're different in the ways he discussed. They're also different in others ways, ways that yeah, he probably should have listed because there's posters on this site focused much more on people's exact language than the actual and obvious intent of their message, but his statement is sloppy- not incorrect.

I mean it's like you had a white egg, and somebody was like "bro, this egg is also white" and then Wookie pointed out that it was black when it was really a very very dark purple.

The important part here is that it's obviously not a white egg.

obviously not white eh?

what are you trying to say there?

I was just asking a question. I'm wrong for not becoming emotionally involved about what happened to TM over every other senseless murder?

1- you're wrong because you continue to attempt to characterize TM's death as similar to other "senseless" murders. The "sense" of his death is essentially the issue.

2- you're wrong because you continue to insist that people would not care about TM were it not for media manipulation.

Well, isn't this special?

http://blog.al.com/spotnews/2013/08/..._river_default

Perhaps you should take a cursory glace at the civil rights movement and the history of race relations in this country and maybe that will help you understand why people's reaction was understandable. Additionally, the overwhelming majority of the people taking to the streets were black, guy. No one is buying your "I'm criticizing the other side too" disclaimer you casually slap on to the end of your posts, either.

Every day it gets easier for me to see why Hemingway blew his head off

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=djHeQPO4d5M

Looks mostly white here or at the very least half white/half black.

Also, most blacks are killed by blacks, most whites are killed by whites. And more whites are killed by blacks than blacks killed by whites. But Zimmerman is hispanic. But this ONE injustice/murder gets cherry picked to be OJesque out of all the murders/injustices out there. It is to brainwash people into caring to create divisiveness. And the proof of that is the face that Zimmerman is labeled as white when he is a self proclaimed hispanic. You can bet your ass that if Zimmerman was a nobel peace prize winning physicist there would be no white label attached to it.

And like I said, the people supporting Zimmerman are even more brainwashed than the Trayvon supporters. Cant create divisiveness without 2 parties.

No matter how many times you keep repeating your asinine claim, it's still wrong. Sorry.

Oh?

I understand that the month of my birth is a pretty big deal, and that I should be celebrated. It's just so gosh darn flattering how many people have decided to do so by joining 2p2 to chat with me about race. WELCOME BRAND SPANKING NEW NEVER BEEN AND NEVER WILL BE BANNED POSTERS. I'M SURE YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS WILL BE OUTSTANDING.

Too soon, bro

Isn't Oxford where Reagan launched his presidential candidacy?

The people are brainwashed, people are zombies perspective is one dimensional, kinda like racism tends to be.