Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Bad Posters Invitational! Round 3 Bad Posters Invitational! Round 3
View Poll Results: The Fail Four!
M: Deuces McCracken
27 58.70%
M: spankthebadwookie
18 39.13%
N: ikestoys
25 54.35%
N: DudeImBetter
19 41.30%

09-26-2014 , 06:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tien
I was just trolling you so I deleted that post.

Honest question and I won't troll. Are you enjoying this kind of attention and talk about you?
No but I do enjoy the chance to substantially dispute the bull**** that has been said about me. You might notice that I don't start this type of **** ever, and am polite to everyone who isn't first outwardly rude to me, even if they disagree with me.
09-26-2014 , 06:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deuces McKracken
In the zimmerman thread I stepped into some of what most people consider black boxes in order to see what I could scrounge up as disscussion worthy. Like, I find it significant that Trayvon was talking on the phone up to the start of the fight and didn't hang up. This is not exactly the behavior of a teen anticipating jumping an grown man who outweighs him. Most people just disregard entire aspects such as that but I think it is worth delving into.
1) I don't think you're right about martin not hanging up
2) Even if you are, there was absolutely no signs of physical damage to martin other than the gun shot. There was no signs he was punched on his body or Zimmerman's hands. Your theory stretches the bounds of possible, it doesn't come close to beyond reasonable doubt
09-26-2014 , 06:18 PM
I've been trolling you for a long time but I'm gonna give it a rest.

You've received enough crap from this invitational.
09-26-2014 , 06:28 PM
ikes and Deuces pushing for votes they don't even need.
09-26-2014 , 06:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
Oh I'm sorry she was hispanic, and you still called her racist.
I don't recall that but I'm not denying that I suggested something like that either. Ur nitpicking tho.
09-26-2014 , 06:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deuces McKracken
No I didn't say "a Jewish guy". I said Wolfowitz. And the ultimate king of antisemitism canards, Gamblor, actually stepped in to say what I said wasnt antisemitism. So STFU on that.
Why is Gamblor's opinion authoritative? Are you saying that just because someone is a Jew their opinion on whether something is anti-semitism is inherently factual?

[/quote]As for the latter charge, see the bad poster's thread to pick up that debate. I admit that I should not have said it without further explication (it was on the eve of presumed continued bombing of a defenseless population which, I don't think you can understand, deeply bothers me), but I have since given that explication regarding my charges which were against the State of Israel, not Jewish people. When you criticize the state of Israel for it's specific actions, and not Jews at large, you cannot be being antisemitic. In that case one is being anti-Israel, which btw, if anyone here isn't, I will have to confiscate your social justice warrior badges immediately.[/QUOTE]
when your posting is always against Israel, discounts any reasonable motive for anything the state does, imputes "evil" motives for everything, always sides against Israel, takes information provided by real anti-Semites as fact and completely discounts anything provided by Israel, when you apply double standards in judging behaviour, when you deny the Jewish people rights you afford to the Greek, the Brazilian, the Arab, the Chinese, the Irish, and all the rest, and when you do a million other things you have done just because Israel is a Jewish state, you are being anti-Semitic.

We all know that Deuces only consciously hates Israel, not Jews. But the ultimate effect is that he hates Jews.

Because lol Deuces.
09-26-2014 , 06:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deuces McKracken
My read on real life ikes is that he's an ahole but I don't think that is even relevant when he has been here for years being himself.
Tell everyone what your real life read was on me, before you realized that you were an idiot.

Go on.
09-26-2014 , 06:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
1) I don't think you're right about martin not hanging up
2) Even if you are, there was absolutely no signs of physical damage to martin other than the gun shot. There was no signs he was punched on his body or Zimmerman's hands. Your theory stretches the bounds of possible, it doesn't come close to beyond reasonable doubt
DeeDee apparently thought he had not hung up. She said she tried to call Trayvon back after what she took as an unintentional disconnect and that was supported by the phone records. Also the timing wrt the gunshot agrees with DeeDee's version. The conversation was going up to the confrontation and ended prematurely. This idea that Trayvon was casually talking on the phone in preparation for and in the midst of jumping zim jives with the racist imagining of Trayvon, as Fly put it, as "some sort of Tupac/Incredible Hulk hybrid", but it doesn't agree with the facts or with sober, common sense thinking about the situation.

Not gonna rehash the actual forensics with someone who thinks the little scratches on zim's head prove anything significant, sorry. But I will say that who won or was winning the fight does not indicate who started it.
09-26-2014 , 06:53 PM
Looks like spank realized that which deuces McCrackhead is unable to understand: if you post like a crazy person, stop posting so much and people will hate you less
09-26-2014 , 07:07 PM
Considering that the bad posters thread accounts for the majority of traffic in PUC, I'm thinking we owe the winner of this tourney a big thank you for providing so much entertainment.

Looking forward to the Deuces victory speech.
09-26-2014 , 07:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
Wow deuces you predicted he wouldn't be murdered. Now what about you calling the black people in the jury self hating racists?
looooooooooooooool at this being the best success Deuces could find to contradict "pretty much" all of his predictions in that thread being wrong.

Zim as good as dead now based on Deuces track record.
09-26-2014 , 07:18 PM
Gambool... just curious why your ratio of posts here vs. the main is something like 50:1?

I mean, I'm not "allowed" to post there. What's your excuse? ... Are you incapable of any semblance of original idea exchange with substance?

Or is it more a reflection on your infantile obsession with petty ridicule and being an unoriginal, shallow, insecure douche bag?
09-26-2014 , 07:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggsCasey
Gambool... just curious why your ratio of posts here vs. the main is something like 50:1?

I mean, I'm not "allowed" to post there. What's your excuse? ... Are you incapable of any semblance of original idea exchange with substance?

Or is it more a reflection on your infantile obsession with petty ridicule and being an unoriginal, shallow, insecure douche bag?
What do you mean "allowed?" Your ass got banned for precisely what you allude to Gamblor not being able to do. Drop the air quotes and projection act ffs.
09-26-2014 , 08:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggsCasey
Gambool... just curious why your ratio of posts here vs. the main is something like 50:1?

I mean, I'm not "allowed" to post there. What's your excuse? ... Are you incapable of any semblance of original idea exchange with substance?

Or is it more a reflection on your infantile obsession with petty ridicule and being an unoriginal, shallow, insecure douche bag?
I am guilty of learning more from the main board than contributing to it. Happy to lose some internet points for that.

On the other hand, I didn't get thrown off the main board for being completely unable to converse civilly with others, so I'm one step ahead of some here.
09-26-2014 , 08:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LetsGambool
I am guilty of learning more from the main board than contributing to it. Happy to lose some internet points for that.
Amen. Because you're just not a very deep thinker, just a petty sideline critic from the school of Ron Borges.

Quote:
Originally Posted by LetsGambool
On the other hand, I didn't get thrown off the main board for being completely unable to converse civilly with others, so I'm one step ahead of some here.
LOL... keep re-writing forum history, like a conservative trying to change U.S. history text books.

Pro tip: That's not why I was banned, and I have the specifically worded private messages (in addition to the crap behavior of others still allowed to post there), to prove it.

"Jiggs was banned because everything he posts has to do with Peak Oil." - Wookie.
09-26-2014 , 08:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DudeImBetter
What do you mean "allowed?" Your ass got banned for precisely what you allude to Gamblor not being able to do. Drop the air quotes and projection act ffs.
You appear to be confusing two posters whose handle begins with "Gam" ...

In any event, miss the point much? This is about Gambool having the CHOICE to post here or there, yet preferring here.

Your baseless assessment of me is horse****, and rich considering you act like a complete tool, and you're still allowed to post there. Here's a sample:

Quote:
Originally Posted by DudeImBetter
I bet you $40 you can geaux bleaux yeauxrself feaxur fibbing.
Yeah, good stuff there. Worthy of a main forum contributor, no doubt. Different when I do it (even though I never reached that level).

I'm sorry you're a semi-finalist in the juvenile Mean Girls contest, but you really shouldn't engage in exchanges you 1) don't know much of anything about, and 2) couldn't look like more of a hypocrite for.

Anyhow, hope you win.
09-26-2014 , 08:45 PM
post the pms jiggs!
09-26-2014 , 08:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
ideal graph is a lol fail
This race is way too close. I just thought I'd remind the straggling voters just why ikestoys is the worst of the bad.

09-26-2014 , 09:01 PM
lol the middle quintile has more money than, maybe the same as, the second quintile trolly. The graph is ****ing stupid, and so are you really.
09-26-2014 , 09:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
lol the middle quintile has more money than, maybe the same as, the second quintile trolly. The graph is ****ing stupid, and so are you really.
It sure looks like the same to me, which is perfectly reasonable. That's not the point of my post.

My point is that you did another of your typical non-substantive "LOL that's wrong" full-stop posts. This kinda post, along with your legendary and infamous #Semaniking for the interwebs #win are what make you the worst of the bad... magnified by you posting your AIDS at a ratio of 1.5x the second poster in pretty much every thread.

09-26-2014 , 09:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shame Trolly !!!1!
It sure looks like the same to me, which is perfectly reasonable.
LOL QUINTILES HOW DO THEY WORK?

I'm sorry missiledog, I'll make more of an effort so simpletons like you can get it. See, those quintiles are based on wealth. Every single person in the second quintile has more wealth than the richest person in the third quintile. Sum that **** up and it means the second quintile has to have more money than the third.
09-26-2014 , 09:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
LOL QUINTILES HOW DO THEY WORK?...


LOLikes, fooled by an optical illusion !!!1!

Once again, that wasn't the point of my post.

You (a) initially did your "LOL that's stupid" full-stop drive-by post thingee. (b) You completely refused to engage with the post. (c) You were wrong anyways. And (d) you doubled-down on your pathetic wrongness trying for the interwebs #win.

This... the drive-by non-substantive one liners paired with this pathetic need to score an interwebs #win... multiplied by your 1.5x over posting ratio in it seems like every thread... make you the worst of the bad.

09-26-2014 , 10:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shame Trolly !!!1!
This race is way too close. I just thought I'd remind the straggling voters just why ikestoys is the worst of the bad.

What's going on in the lower left pic? If you don't vote for ike, you'll be shot in the foot?
09-26-2014 , 10:02 PM
How did i not engage? I clearly did, and it being remotely close is still completely ****ing stupid. Go brush up on your math and stay in the corner with your dunce cap until you figure it out.
09-26-2014 , 10:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggsCasey
You appear to be confusing two posters whose handle begins with "Gam" ...

In any event, miss the point much? This is about Gambool having the CHOICE to post here or there, yet preferring here.
Nah brah, my point is that your flavor of suck was so undesirable and so generalized that you were kicked the **** out of Chained. When you blow for so long and hard in Chained that they ban you outright, guess what? It's time to not ask condescending questions about posters' habits in that forum. Or do, but accept that doing so will be a bad look in the eyes of your readers. Your call.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggsCasey
Your baseless assessment of me is horse****, and rich considering you act like a complete tool, and you're still allowed to post there. Here's a sample:
PERK EARL is apparently less desirable than my weak word play jabs at randos. What does that tell you? CONSPIRACY, or you're more offensively terrible. I know which one I believe is right.


Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggsCasey
I'm sorry you're a semi-finalist in the juvenile Mean Girls contest, but you really shouldn't engage in exchanges you 1) don't know much of anything about, and 2) couldn't look like more of a hypocrite for.
Thanks for the pro tip, but I think I'll keep inserting needles where I see fit.

Hey Jiggs, you still spend more time up in Chained than down here despite the ban? You know you do. Reading all those posts from people you used to engage about oil. There's something very sad about that. Pathetic is the word actually. Something pathetic about it. About you.

      
m