grunching

People here do realize Missiledog and his "union" would literally kill most of you if the tide turned in his mob's favor, right?

I know it's cool he rustles libertarian jimmies(he does).

Own too much property? death. Don't want to give up what you own? death. Business owner? death. In the wrong place while the neanderthals are burning the cities? death.

I'd be safe so it's cool.

I have many issues with MissleDog's beliefs - but the thread isn't really about him, is it?

I mean, I can think many different people are wrong at the same time.

citation_needed.wav

Oh, that's right... over here scumbags can make unsubstantiated claims without mod action. Well played scumbag, well played.

Anyways, let's start with why this scumbag put "union" in scare quotes. Why the scare quotes scumbag? I belong to a real union, and it has a real name... Industrial Workers of the World. We have been around since 1905. We have an official policy, and long and well documented history, of practicing non-violence. A lot of Gandhi & ML.Kings non-violence was directly inspired by our actions. If anyone even slightly believes this scumbag's calumny... google is your friend, and will quickly point out his lies.

No it's not. This is LirvA's ACist thread. If the scumbag wants to make a thread to spread lies about the IWW he should start his own... not try to hyjack LirvA's.

Ok. Then tell us how you, an anarchist would deal with captialists. Let's say a factory owner didn't want to relinquish his property. What would happen to him? How would you deal with it?

Well ya, otherwise what would be the point?

What part about (a) looking up history, since we are talking about the real world, and (b) starting your own thread if that's what you wanna chat about... that you don't seem to understand? Why are you trying to hyjack LirvA's thread with your mindless crap, dirtbag ??

I'm gonna take that as a "we'll kill them"

ACist: no, yours is the dumbest system
ASist: no, yours is the dumbest system
Statist: neither of you have the monopoly on idiocy

This is a thread about anarchy. You are the real anarchist. Lirva made a one word OP, you have posted several times itt. Lrirva isn't around. Why don't you tell us about how YOU would deal with capitalists who didn't hand over their property. I'm saying you would commit a mass amount of violence against capitalists, many who held out would be killed. Is this wrong?

None libertarian types: ACism/ASism are oxymorans not 'systems', and 'statist' is just an idiotic term that libertarian types use to lump everyone else together who aren't libertarian types.

I think you've got that backwards, actually

Dude, if I wanted to discuss real world anarchism I'd start my own thread. If this is a topic you are truly interested in... it's a matter of real world history for about 200 years and today's current news... why do you need to know, or even care, what 'I' would hypothetically do'? I've yet to understand this quirky bit of idiocy from youz guyz.

LivrA will be back, why hyjack his thread?

Threads are free... get off your lazy behind, do a little googling about the real world history of your subject, pick some relevant quotes as conversation starters... and then start your own damn thread.

Or STFU dirtbag!

Is that a "yes, I will kill people own too much property or who don't hand over their stuff," or a "I will not kill people who own too much property or refuse to hand over their stuff"?

Youre doing fine work jdizzle, keep it up.

Honestly, I dont have any negative feelings towards the term "statist". It just means you are not an anarchist and can thus be used interchangeable with "realist" and "correct".

It's such a wide ranging term that simply calling someone a statist has no real meaning unless you're getting fairly specific with it.

As has been repeatedly pointed out, capitalism is impossible without a coercive hierarchy to enforce their sacred property rights. These anarcho-crapitalists don't want to abolish the state, merely privatize it. So they are statists too.

As has been repeatedly pointed out, this is absolute nonsense. Capitalism cannot exist without a state to support it? Does this imply that capitalism most DEFINITELY could not exist if the state was trying to snuff it out? Yeah?




lol you guys

MD, answer the questions.

That's a gross misuse of the term 'capitalism', which means more than just 'trade'. Regardless, when advocating a political philosophy, organized crime is not a good example to use if you want to win people over. lol.

Keep shilling for your privatized state though.

Wait, are you trying to say the government isn't organized crime?

What questions?

Monarchies and Communist regimes outlawed drug dealing too... so does that mean monarchies and real world Communism can exist without governments too ?? Are you flippin hi ??

You're so ******ed MissileDog.