bitches

i this thread

so much

Already more content than a normal LirvA thread.

Lirva should nourish his own threads more iyam

That isn't a question about radical unionism, it's a question about me personally. And you already know the answer.

Nope, never said anything like that. And... that isn't a question about radical unionism in general, or my union (IWW) in particular.

That isn't a question about radical unionism in general, or my union (IWW) in particular. It's a question about me personally.

That isn't a question about radical unionism in general, or my union (IWW) in particular. It's a question about me personally.

Furthermore, there is a protocol in the activist community regarding discussing illegal direct actions in a public forum. Basically it's only proper if you put absolutely nobody else in legal harms way, and (a) you've been convicted, (b) you can't be tried (statute of limitations, etc), or (c) unanimous consent of all involved. Here is how the ALF phrases this...

That was UMWA (AFL-CIO).

That isn't a question about radical unionism in general, or my union (IWW) in particular. It's a question about me personally.

Of course, and so are you. You just don't realize it and are rooting against yourself.

That isn't a question about radical unionism in general, or my union (IWW) in particular. It's a question about me personally.

Well first off all, while Chomsky is a member of the IWW, he isn't a spokesman. That's just his opinion man. Secondly, your whole concept of the "size and power of the state" is fundamentally flawed and incoherent. Basically you're are processing garbage-in, garbage-out here.

Sure there have been tons of threads about ACism... but first off every ACist is completely different, so every ACist needs to explain their own personal 'theory' seperately. Then we have the pesky problem that there actually is no "basic philosophy" of ACism to begin with -- how can there be, it's all just an exercise in sophistry, trying to con people into going along with a logically impossible square-circle psuedo-ideology.

Basically, no ACists ever actually answer any questions about ACism... ever.

And as I've pointed out about 100x to you, ASism is borodog's personal 'theory' of a liberal brand of ACism which he calls "Anarcho-Socialism". I sure ain't no ASist, why do you keep bugging me about this ASism crap ??

That goes for all of you Anarcho-whatevas.

ZOMG you are a worthless troll.

I enjoy talking losers like LirvA around in cirlces regarding their idiotic sophistry, pointing out the gaping holes in their so-called 'logic'... just for the LOLZ.

And you enjoy what here... posting mindless spam as a form of self-amusement?

Hey Captain Crayola how about you shut your cakehole.

THUNDERDOME!

It's anarchy in hurr I post wat I want.

I've never put anyone on ignore, becuase I wanna read the bad idiot posters for the LOLZ. But I'm might just try it with you because you aren't ever funny or even idiotic--- you're just content free mindless spam.

I believe the free market will show that Captain Crayola thing was funny.

Edit: Also, how the **** can you call me content-free I made the hippo pooping thread, beeyotch.

Meh.

Falcon is a pretty good poster imho

in the UK

The funny thing is that most of the punk bitches whinging about anarchy are just the folks that will be made into punk bitches by the more strong and powerful if there were to be anarchy.

TRUTH BOMB IN YO FACES

But, but, if the more powerful and strong would boss the weak around than it wouldn't really be anarchy, right

granching

but who will build the roads?

Have we worked out yet how young is too young in anarchism? Cos if you pervs just led with that instead of hiding it as if it isnt the entire reason you want to get rid of the law you might win over a bunch more 4chan pervs.

Or is it so low that even pedobear worshiping ****tards would be disgusted?

Here's one reason why they think we shouldn't have age of consent laws: