Yea, what do journalists know anyway? Give it to me in a low res 30 second youtube clip though, and we have our proof!

I do like how the guy "just asking questions" refers to "his side"'s people as Dr. and such, but it's "editor at some newspaper" and "some *teacher*? at NYU". Bias much?

I would also answer his highly contrived fog of war question with the following: it's not a specific example, but I'm sure there are plenty of examples of reports of "suspect captured" before the suspect was actually captured, and then later a suspect was captured.

Of course, our friend who is supposedly "just asking questions" will now change his questions again...

So the BBC and Silverstein were for some reason embroiled in a conspiracy to destroy WTC7, unknown people were embroiled in a conspiracy to short airline stocks, and Donald Rumsfeld thought destroying the accounting office would help solve the problem of poor financial records?

(it seems that after the accounting office was destroyed the missing records problem would only get worse, and also crashing a plane into the accounting office is a really inefficient way of destroying records)

So we have three different groups of people doing entirely different plots, and it just so happens that they all settled on the plane crashing technique? How did they find each other?

Also as we know from Green Magi there was no plane that crashed into the Pentagon or in PA. So you got some questions to answer there. What happened to United 93?

What do you think Lost was based on? It wasn't fiction, fly. Gawd, how naive can you be?

So 9/11 was a scheme to short-sell an airline company? Wait... isn't that the plot to Casino Royale?