Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
14 dead in Chicago: Give Stop and Frisk a try? 14 dead in Chicago: Give Stop and Frisk a try?
View Poll Results: Try Stop and Frisk?
Yes
6 19.35%
No
25 80.65%

07-07-2014 , 10:39 PM
Howard, I'm glad to see you and glad you are posting in unchained.

Cheers!
07-07-2014 , 10:39 PM
Sock it to... me?
07-07-2014 , 10:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spanktehbadwookie
Howard, I'm glad to see you and glad you are posting in unchained.

Cheers!


Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
Sock it to... me?
My main reason for watching that show:

07-07-2014 , 10:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Howard Beale
You are right, there has been profiling. That can be fixed by frisking w/o profiling just like the TSA has searched my old mother in her wheel chair so that they can avoid that charge.
Yea they did that to my WWII veteran dad. He has refused to fly ever since.
Quote:
Can you give an example of 'things which could be done other than frisking'? The commissioner said that the police department had given their best effort.
Like staying out of the areas with the most gun violence? How about having the Illinois National Guard help patrol some of the high crime areas.
07-07-2014 , 10:49 PM
That was everybody's main reason for watching the show, Howard.
07-07-2014 , 10:52 PM
Did you own any Doors LPs? Which ones?
07-07-2014 , 11:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LASJayhawk
How about having the Illinois National Guard help patrol some of the high crime areas.
They are not trained for that and I don't think that the state can afford it for long anyway.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CohibaBehike
I'm a huge proponent of stop and frisk but,

You can't stop and frisk everyone equally. I have no problem if police want to stop and frisk ...
Sadly, every ethnic/racial and economic group would have to be stopped and frisked equally regardless of results. The TSA knows that they don't have to search my 90 y.o. uncle who has to show his hip replacement card when going through the metal detector but they do it anyway for a reason.

Quote:
Originally Posted by zikzak
That was everybody's main reason for watching the show, Howard.
I would've gladly used my 'one time' for her.

Last edited by spanktehbadwookie; 07-08-2014 at 12:01 PM.
07-07-2014 , 11:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
Did you own any Doors LPs? Which ones?
Prob all of them.

One more and then I stop answering unless it's unavoidably clever.
07-07-2014 , 11:53 PM
Yes, we should aspire to make police more like the TSA said no one ever before now.

Glad to see you dropped using the police chief statement in your argument since he clearly is referring to stricter gun laws, which you dismissed out of hand.

Any policy talking about stopping and frisking rich white people as somehow being a politically viable option is sheer lunacy. "Hey, we raised taxes and cut other services to give more money to police so you can be stopped and frisked for weapons outside your trendy coffee shop" will fly exactly never.
07-07-2014 , 11:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Howard Beale
One more and then I stop answering unless it's unavoidably clever.
What went wrong?
07-08-2014 , 12:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
What went wrong?
He's mad as hell and he's not going to take it anymore.
07-08-2014 , 12:53 AM
Quote:
Sadly, every ethnic/racial and economic group would have to be stopped and frisked equally
Sad indeed.
07-08-2014 , 01:09 AM
ZOMG... this is all so wrong.

At this point in history, the term "Stop and Frisk" is a term of infamy... or a dog whistle. Just like prating-on about 'States Rights' isn't a good tactic if you wish to discuss US-style federalism, so to with prating about "Stop and Frisk".

At this point in history, the term "Stop and Frisk" is uniquely identified with the NYPD enforcement policy of that name.

The infamously racist, classist, IMO unconstitutional, and unquestionable both odious and evil NYPD enforcement policy. As an adult, I've only spent one full day in NYC... and I'm pretty proud I found time on that day to help shut down Broadway during a march in opposition to "Stop and Frisk".

No Justice, no Peace.

But of course, Howard Beale previously argued in favor of NYPD's "Stop and Frisk". And now he says... sure, let's extend that to privileged people in the affluent areas too. Or in other words...

Let's just all repeal the 4th amendment. ZOMG.
07-08-2014 , 03:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Howard Beale
14 killed, dozens hurt in Chicago shootings.

CHICAGO (AP) — Extra police officers on Chicago's streets weren't enough to quell a long weekend of violence that ended with 14 people shot to death and dozens more injured.

During a Monday news conference, just hours after two more people were shot to death earlier in the day, Police Superintendent Garry McCarthy said his department's best efforts could not prevent the bloodshed that spiked dramatically on Sunday. Chicago's total of 53 shooting incidents for the holiday weekend easily eclipsed Detroit and New York combined, which had a total of 46 shooting incidents, 10 of which were fatal.



I can't make sense out of this quote

"There has to come a tipping point where this changes," Chicago Police Superintendent Garry McCarthy said Monday of the violence. "The illogical nature of what's happening here -- that government can intercede and prevent this from happening is overwhelming. And I refuse to think otherwise in a great country like America that we can continue to allow this to happen -- not just on a state, but on a federal level."

Stop and Frisk? Something else? What else?
Quote:
Originally Posted by LetsGambool
Yes, we should aspire to make police more like the TSA said no one ever before now.

Glad to see you dropped using the police chief statement in your argument since he clearly is referring to stricter gun laws, which you dismissed out of hand.

Any policy talking about stopping and frisking rich white people as somehow being a politically viable option is sheer lunacy. "Hey, we raised taxes and cut other services to give more money to police so you can be stopped and frisked for weapons outside your trendy coffee shop" will fly exactly never.


















07-08-2014 , 05:13 AM
We've had stop and search in the UK for a while now. It's always been a controversial piece of leglislation and is currently under review.

BBC News

Quote:
Police stop and search powers in England and Wales are to be overhauled with a revised code of conduct, Home Secretary Theresa May has said.

She told MPs an inquiry had found 27% of searches may have been illegal.
Quote:
Recent figures show only about 10% of more than a million searches lead to an arrest, with black people six times more likely to be stopped than those who are white.
Quote:
Mrs May said when misused, stop and search was an "enormous waste of police time" and "hugely damaging to the relationship between the police and the public".
Interesting that three times as many searches were illegal as those that actually resulted in an arrest. Stop and search actually caused an increase in crime!
07-08-2014 , 06:14 AM
53 shootings in one weekend in one city? From a UK perspective I just find a figure like that to be truly staggering.
07-08-2014 , 07:45 AM
Howard, I know critical thinking isn't really your thing, otherwise I'd point to the part of the quote where the police chief refers to Federal and State laws he wants to change while stop and frisk is a city policy.

But you do have access to Google yes?

http://www.cnn.com/2014/07/07/justic...html?hpt=hp_t1

Quote:
(CNN) -- Chicago's police superintendent lashed out at what he called lax state and federal gun laws after a violent Fourth of July weekend that saw more than 60 people shot and nine killed in a city already known for frequent shootings.
Quote:
"Possession of a loaded firearm -- it's not even considered a violent felony in the state of Illinois for sentencing purposes -- which is why you see the revolving door," he said.
Or, if you don't have access to google, how about from your own link?

Quote:
McCarthy, who came to the nation's third-largest city from New York, used the opportunity to again highlight the number of guns that are on Chicago's streets. While Chicago has tough gun sales and possession ordinances, McCarthy maintains that Illinois needs stiffer penalties for people who violate gun laws.

McCarthy said his officers are seeing more suspects who are reluctant to throw down their guns when confronted by police because they're more concerned with harsh treatment from their gangs if they lose their weapons than the legal system if they are arrested with them.

"Possession of a loaded firearm is not even considered a violent felony in the state of Illinois for sentencing purposes," McCarthy said, noting that gangs, on the other hand, may severely beat a member who loses a gun.
He wants stricter gun laws.

lol Howard. Cute eye pictures though. Stick to the old timer anecdotes about what a brave guy Sheriff Joe is and worry less about public policy changes.
07-08-2014 , 08:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LetsGambool
Howard, I know critical thinking isn't really your thing, otherwise I'd point to the part of the quote where the police chief refers to Federal and State laws he wants to change while stop and frisk is a city policy.


He wants stricter gun laws.
The part quoted is perfectly illustrative of what happened and can stand alone. After the hand wringing they all cry up gun control when there's nothing else that they can do but, while waiting for what's not going to happen short of Tinkerbell sprinkling her pixie dust, I'd try something else.

Quote:
lol Howard. Cute eye pictures though. Stick to the old timer anecdotes about what a brave guy Sheriff Joe is and worry less about public policy changes.
I left one out:

07-08-2014 , 08:11 AM
I thought ending welfare was your solution? Did you read the part where even if they stop and frisk someone and find a weapon the person isn't doing time?

Minority groups do thank you for your tireless work at finding solutions that just happen to roll back their rights. Say hi to Sheriff Joe for us.
07-08-2014 , 09:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Howard Beale
Why, btw, does it necessarily involve racial profiling? All that has to be done is Stop and Frisk everywhere in the city and all classes and racial groups will be stopped and frisked equally.
07-08-2014 , 09:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Husker
53 shootings in one weekend in one city? From a UK perspective I just find a figure like that to be truly staggering.
For perspective, 10 fatalities is about 1/3 of the total UK gun homicide figure for a whole year.
07-08-2014 , 09:59 AM
Not only is Stop and Frisk super gross and racist, you have to be a complete ****ing idiot to think it's a solution to the violence in Chicago.

You're too dumb (and hateful) to have these conversations Howard. They'll only further expose you as a sack of crap.
07-08-2014 , 10:50 AM
Legalize drugs, LDO.

Last edited by Barcalounger; 07-08-2014 at 10:51 AM. Reason: Illegal guns hard to buy when drug dealing money dries up.
07-08-2014 , 11:08 AM
Can someone who is against stop and frisk but laughs at Proph in the other thread for being against traffic stops for drunk driving explain to me, a foreigner, what the difference is? Why is it totally laughable to be against both of them?
07-08-2014 , 11:15 AM
We need to make a distinction between DUI checkpoints and individual traffic stops for the suspicion of DUI. That distinction should make it obvious.

      
m