Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
14 dead in Chicago: Give Stop and Frisk a try? 14 dead in Chicago: Give Stop and Frisk a try?
View Poll Results: Try Stop and Frisk?
Yes
6 19.35%
No
25 80.65%

07-07-2014 , 08:32 PM
14 killed, dozens hurt in Chicago shootings.

CHICAGO (AP) — Extra police officers on Chicago's streets weren't enough to quell a long weekend of violence that ended with 14 people shot to death and dozens more injured.

During a Monday news conference, just hours after two more people were shot to death earlier in the day, Police Superintendent Garry McCarthy said his department's best efforts could not prevent the bloodshed that spiked dramatically on Sunday. Chicago's total of 53 shooting incidents for the holiday weekend easily eclipsed Detroit and New York combined, which had a total of 46 shooting incidents, 10 of which were fatal.



I can't make sense out of this quote

"There has to come a tipping point where this changes," Chicago Police Superintendent Garry McCarthy said Monday of the violence. "The illogical nature of what's happening here -- that government can intercede and prevent this from happening is overwhelming. And I refuse to think otherwise in a great country like America that we can continue to allow this to happen -- not just on a state, but on a federal level."

Stop and Frisk? Something else? What else?

Last edited by Howard Beale; 07-07-2014 at 08:33 PM. Reason: I vote yes, ldo.
07-07-2014 , 08:34 PM
07-07-2014 , 08:41 PM
Veteran With Concealed Carry Permit Shoots Back At Chicago Gunman

http://news.yahoo.com/veteran-concea...031804649.html
07-07-2014 , 08:48 PM
Marlin Williams' niece Tonya Gunn was among the nine victims, killed in a drive-by shooting Sunday night while she was cooking food on the grill. Her 11-year-old daughter witnessed the shooting.
07-07-2014 , 08:57 PM
Why stop at stop and frisk? People may have guns smuggled in from nearby jurisdictions in their homes. Doesn't the logical conclusion of stop n frisk thinking lead to house to house searches?
07-07-2014 , 09:13 PM
Just ban guns obviously....
07-07-2014 , 09:20 PM
Howard, didn't you advocate for stop and frisk in NYC in some other thread? What's up with your hard-on when it comes to this practice, which almost necessarily involves racial profiling?
07-07-2014 , 09:29 PM
Howard, did you ever watch Laugh-In when you were a kid?
07-07-2014 , 09:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Howard Beale
Stop and Frisk? Something else? What else?
Accept that violent crime is getting lower and lower, and not give up vital rights to speed up the process?
07-07-2014 , 10:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DudeImBetter
Howard, didn't you advocate for stop and frisk in NYC in some other thread? What's up with your hard-on when it comes to this practice, which almost necessarily involves racial profiling?
Yes, I advocated for it bec, as the Chicago police chief said, their best efforts couldn't prevent the carnage, guns laws aren't going to be changed substantially, and I care enough about all of the dead ppl to want to do something about it.

Why, btw, does it necessarily involve racial profiling? All that has to be done is Stop and Frisk everywhere in the city and all classes and racial groups will be stopped and frisked equally.
07-07-2014 , 10:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
Howard, did you ever watch Laugh-In when you were a kid?
JFC, just come out w/ w/e insult you intended w/o beating around the bush.
07-07-2014 , 10:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Howard Beale
Marlin Williams' niece Tonya Gunn was among the nine victims, killed in a drive-by shooting Sunday night while she was cooking food on the grill. Her 11-year-old daughter witnessed the shooting.
Oh ****, that happened? My bad, we definitely need to randomly stop black men on the street now. You got me, Howard, you finally converted me.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Howard Beale
Why, btw, does it necessarily involve racial profiling? All that has to be done is Stop and Frisk everywhere in the city and all classes and racial groups will be stopped and frisked equally.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Tell you what, when New York starts stopping and frisking everyone equally, we can roll it out to other cities. But only then.

Spoiler:
LOL if you think this program survives when well-to-do white people have to face being stopped on the street by police as if they were a common black person
07-07-2014 , 10:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Howard Beale
Yes, I advocated for it bec, as the Chicago police chief said, their best efforts couldn't prevent the carnage, guns laws aren't going to be changed substantially, and I care enough about all of the dead ppl to want to do something about it.

Why, btw, does it necessarily involve racial profiling? All that has to be done is Stop and Frisk everywhere in the city and all classes and racial groups will be stopped and frisked equally.
Hint: the police chief is advocating for tougher gun laws.

Hint 2: stop and frisk will last about two days if the police start frisking random white people in the rich areas of the city.
07-07-2014 , 10:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spanktehbadwookie
Why stop at stop and frisk? People may have guns smuggled in from nearby jurisdictions in their homes. Doesn't the logical conclusion of stop n frisk thinking lead to house to house searches?
No. There are a lot of ppl w/ illegal guns in their houses for protection from the predators. Every now and then in NYC some bodega owner would get in trouble for shooting would be robbers w/ his illegal gun and get a great amount of public sympathy.

The difference is intent. If you're carrying on the street the implication that you intend mayhem is valid, imo.
07-07-2014 , 10:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Howard Beale

Why, btw, does it necessarily involve racial profiling? All that has to be done is Stop and Frisk everywhere in the city and all classes and racial groups will be stopped and frisked equally.
Is that all? Well s***, then it must be super easy for you to identify a time that stop and frisk (or the like) was implemented without an onslaught of profiling claims surfacing not long afterwards.

And I think you can identify things which could be done other than frisking at will whoever looks "suspicious," or however it is that cops are supposed to go about this.
07-07-2014 , 10:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
Tell you what, when New York starts stopping and frisking everyone equally, we can roll it out to other cities. But only then.

Spoiler:
LOL if you think this program survives when well-to-do white people have to face being stopped on the street by police as if they were a common black person
OK w/ me. Stop and Frisk everyone equally. I further think that you've got the spoil part wrong. If this were happening in middle and upper class neighborhoods I think there'd be a clamoring for Stop and Frisk in those neighborhoods.
07-07-2014 , 10:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
Oh ****, that happened? My bad, we definitely need to randomly stop black men on the street now. You got me, Howard, you finally converted me.



HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Tell you what, when New York starts stopping and frisking everyone equally, we can roll it out to other cities. But only then.

Spoiler:
LOL if you think this program survives when well-to-do white people have to face being stopped on the street by police as if they were a common black person
I would pay cash money to see Bloomberg stopped and frisked.
07-07-2014 , 10:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Howard Beale
OK w/ me. Stop and Frisk everyone equally. I further think that you've got the spoil part wrong. If this were happening in middle and upper class neighborhoods I think there'd be a clamoring for Stop and Frisk in those neighborhoods.
So just kinda suspend the 4th amendment, like martial law or something?
07-07-2014 , 10:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DudeImBetter
Is that all? Well s***, then it must be super easy for you to identify a time that stop and frisk (or the like) was implemented without an onslaught of profiling claims surfacing not long afterwards.

And I think you can identify things which could be done other than frisking at will whoever looks "suspicious," or however it is that cops are supposed to go about this.
You are right, there has been profiling. That can be fixed by frisking w/o profiling just like the TSA has searched my old mother in her wheel chair so that they can avoid that charge.

Can you give an example of 'things which could be done other than frisking'? The commissioner said that the police department had given their best effort.
07-07-2014 , 10:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Howard Beale
JFC, just come out w/ w/e insult you intended w/o beating around the bush.
Is that a no? Just trying to imagine what you were like in the late 60s. Were you more of an Ed Sullivan Show fan?
07-07-2014 , 10:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LASJayhawk
So just kinda suspend the 4th amendment, like martial law or something?
Got to do something. Some government lawyer could prob come up w/ a way so that it can be done constitutionally. Either that or let the bodies pile up.
07-07-2014 , 10:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
Is that a no? Just trying to imagine what you were like in the late 60s. Were you more of an Ed Sullivan Show fan?
I watched them both and they both had very high ratings.

I watched All in the Family also in the dorm lounge which I'm half surprised didn't float off into the air due to the amount of pot smoke in the air.
07-07-2014 , 10:34 PM
Oh man, you were a Dragnet fan, weren't you. I can totally see that.
07-07-2014 , 10:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
Oh man, you were a Dragnet fan, weren't you. I can totally see that.
You should've just led w/ that.
07-07-2014 , 10:37 PM
What's wrong with Laugh-In? The joke wall was one of the greatest bits of television ever.

      
m