Um, Seriously? - Page 4 - Winning Poker Network -- Two Plus Two Poker Forums

If everyone is saying that the pros have the most to benefit from HUDs then yes, everyone is wrong on that issue. But, truth be known, not everyone is saying that, so no not everyone is wrong on that issue.

If WPN got rid of HUDs, I would probably not play on WPN. Databases are the most important tool in preventing players from getting cheated. My biggest problem with Bovada is their lack of transparency due to their anonymous tables blocking the use of databases.

Furthermore, if WPN got rid of HUDs, then even I, with my very limited technical skills could put something together that would allow me to use a HUD if I so chose. Getting rid of HUDs would only increase the disparity amongst players, not decrease it.

Also let me point out that this was a polite response to your post. All of my posts to you have been polite. If you start getting rude with comments like that Baghdad Bob comment, I'll hand you your ass.

Ok , good post..

There is validity to what your saying but I think there is a ton of validity to what I said. If you're objective and honest then u have to admit what I said. . I'm not going to argue the "self evident"

Most people are just nits around here and would feel very comfortable working for our brave and glorious leader Obama's ministry of officially sanctioned government information.. talk about spin and ignoring the self evident..

What about seat scrpters.

01-14-2016 , 03:27 PM

#78

Boney526

veteran

Join Date: Dec 2012 Posts: 2,314

Quote:

Originally Posted by thesparten1

Most people are just nits around here and would feel very comfortable working for our brave and glorious leader Obama's ministry of officially sanctioned government information.. talk about spin and ignoring the self evident..

What about seat scrpters.

What the actual hell is this post.

01-14-2016 , 03:36 PM

#79

CastleFrank13

adept

Join Date: Jan 2015 Posts: 720

Quote:

Originally Posted by thesparten1

I really, really need to ask you this. If you feel huds and seat scrips are of such an advantage why do you not get them yourself? And please keep in mind that if a site does not ban them then people using them are not in the wrong, they are only trying gain an advantage over the competition and make no mistake about it, poker is a competition. If you really just want to have fun then winning or losing shouldn't really matter. If you want to compete and possibly be a winner then get to work and improve yourself. I guess it really is easier to blame others for your failures than to look at yourself in the mirror and realize the problem is right in front of you.

01-14-2016 , 06:17 PM

#80

otatop

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 12,721

Quote:

Originally Posted by thesparten1

There is validity to what your saying but I think there is a ton of validity to what I said.

No ****.

Quote:

If you're objective and honest then u have to admit what I said. . I'm not going to argue the "self evident"

Objectively, banning HUDs hurts recs more than grinders, because grinders can still beat the **** out of recs with no HUD, while recs losing their HUD means they lose whatever advantage it gave them.

Let's use a golf analogy: Who does banning long putters impact more, PGA Pros who can more easily adapt to a traditional putter, or 70 year old men who use the long putters to help their backs?

Page 4 of 4

First

1 2 3 4

Last

...

Page 4 of 4

First

1 2 3 4

Last