why do so many players have "inactive" under their names, when they aren't inactive? annoying as hell.

Any update or time frame on fixing mucked cards at SD?

Rather than make a thread about 50 cents:

Winning Poker Network (Yatahay) - $0.05 NL (6 max) - Holdem - 5 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4

UTG: 176.8 BB (VPIP: 44.21, PFR: 26.32, 3Bet Preflop: 12.82, Hands: 97)
CO: 136.2 BB (VPIP: 72.22, PFR: 0.00, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 20)
BTN: 36.6 BB (VPIP: 33.33, PFR: 5.56, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 36)
SB: 100 BB (VPIP: 28.57, PFR: 20.41, 3Bet Preflop: 2.63, Hands: 98)
Hero (BB): 129 BB

SB posts SB 0.4 BB, Hero posts BB 1 BB

Pre Flop: (pot: 1.4 BB) Hero has A 8

fold, CO calls 1 BB, fold, fold, Hero raises to 3 BB, CO calls 2 BB

Flop: (6.4 BB, 2 players) 3 7 7
Hero bets 4 BB, CO raises to 8 BB, Hero calls 4 BB

Turn: (22.4 BB, 2 players) K
Hero checks, CO checks

River: (22.4 BB, 2 players) Q
Hero checks, CO checks

CO shows 6 A (One Pair, Sevens)
(Pre 36%, Flop 37%, Turn 36%)
Hero shows A 8 (One Pair, Sevens)
(Pre 64%, Flop 63%, Turn 64%)
CO wins 10.8 BB
Hero wins 10.6 BB

In reality, my opponent received the pot and I lost at showdown. Obviously A6 doesn't beat A8 there. It's clearly f'd up too because it shows me as losing 2 cents in PT4.

Nice hand, WPN.

Can someone point me at the problem, please, 'cause I ain't seeing one other than the odd chip on a chopped pot.

Please buy Carbon's software. For being a site so dedicated to grinders, the software continues to be subpar and its not easy on the eyes at all.

Maybe this has been asked before, but.. why is there only one sound for:

"bet"
"raise"
"all-in"

Most other sites have distinctions, no? (well not PS ironically)
People's ears must get tired.

edit: lol funny, I see I asked about this in 2013.

I was watching Leatherasses twitch the other day, and it looks like be has some mod that makes the cards larger & color coded and much easier to read. Maybe this is just an display option that i cant find and im a huge idiot. Certainly plausible too.

...smh...I told you - Regardless of what it says in the hand history I posted, I lost 2cents on the pot and he won the whole pot. I should have one with a higher kicker.

Even going by the hand history posted - You don't see why that's not a split pot?

He is using the 'other' card deck as an option. There are two. I think you have to first click 4 color deck to see it.

You both have 77AKQ.

If you did lose the hand, post the raw hh with the hh #.. or at least the hh # so that someone like WPN_Rep can look into it.

?? What does Carbon's software do that WPN doesn't?

In case you haven't noticed: Merge is dying a pretty rapid death right now.

edit: As for the software - The details page still isn't updating "all ins" correctly. I'm still stuck at "2" all ins in real money and obviously I've had a lot more than that. Please fix. What's the sense of even keeping track of the statistic if it's not going to update accurately?

Merges software is much smoother, faster, and cleaner looking, imo.

They aren't tracking allins, without looking I'd guess that is for disconnect protection.

Fair enough...I'll take your word for it. That said, I've never had some of the problems other folks complain about with WPN's software. I just don't see how much faster and cleaner it could get at this point. Maybe if I put in some time on Merge's software (can't) I'd feel differently.

Merge's software actually runs a lot smoother than WPN (+mac support). A bunch of people complain about the WPN's old software and the sooner they buy out merge the better.

I think my deal is that I started playing poker about 18 months ago very, very briefly on the old WPN software before they made the improvements and updated the graphics. Since then, I started playing heavy a couple of months ago and other than WPN's "new" software, I haven't played on anything other than BetOnline, FullFlush, and Intertops...and of course, Intertops is the only decent software out of that bunch. So I really have nothing of quality to compare WPN to at this point.

How is that for disconnect protection? It says "all ins real money" and "all ins play money". Both of mine say "2" for some odd reason.

Also, as I just noticed this: Why did they remove the number of hands you've played total? They used to track this on the details page and now it's gone.

Disconnect protection-

Basically.. if you disconnect, it plays out the hand as if you are all-in (rather than you being folded). You can't lose any more money, but you are still eligible to win whatever was in the pot when you disconnect. Sites limit the amount of times you can do this because it used to be abuse by players that would purposely disconnect themselves.

Again, I haven't looked.. so it might be something else.. but I'd be surprised if it was.

^ I understand now. Thanks.

Your kickers didn't play. The pot was chopped, as per the posted history.

Right, but in reality it gave him all of the pot except 2 cents of it which it returned to me. As in, when the hand ended, it slid the money to him but returned 2 cents to me.

Believe me, I looked at it several times in the replayer after it happened. I wouldn't report it here before I made 100% sure there was a glitch on the hand or at least enough reason to believe there was.

Would you give me the hand number please?

#393654580 as per PT4.

The only problem I have with the software is when someone raises, calls, folds, or any other action before my turn their name is hidden by what action they just performed. I stack 10 tables and don't use software and it takes time for me to wait to see who has acted before me so I can figure out what I wanna do. This seems like a huge snag for someone like me. I'd love to see the action elsewhere as this is a type of issue that can become compounded on top of itself where I'm taking forever on a bunch of tables and having the same issue on more then 1 table.

Is there really other sites with better software? There are problems here and there but WPN seems a lot like stars where it's simple, clean, and easy to play a ton of tables. Other then connection issues its an awesome site.

I'm sure some will crucify you for comparing it to Stars but I know what you mean. They're clearly trying to replicate the ease of use and functionality that Stars has always offered.

Again, I don't have a LOT to compare it to but I don't have a lot of complaints with the software and I rarely have any connection issues on this site.