Over the past couple days I've lost 9 times in a row with Ace-big vs Ace-small AIPF in MTTs. By my calculations the chances of this happening are 0.25^9 = 0.0004% (correct me if I'm wrong)

I initially posted this in BBV and someone's mention of bots and WPN sketchiness made me wonder a little... so what say you?

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/54...orite-1653033/

Lol @ asking for advice in bbv or expecting a sensical response there . That variance op. Bots have nothing to do with what you are describing.

WPN has a lot of bots and since the bots are paying rake, they probably don't give a damn. But what you are experiencing is probably just really bad variance.

Yeah, I wasn't expecting advice there. I just felt like venting and that's the appropriate place to do so.

Fishiness is in the air. No one ever talks about run good on ACR

Not many players rush to forums when they are on a heater. I ran $20 over EV in a 1k hand session yesterday.

As for the bot debate, I see a lot of foreign players but no real indications of bots.

A thread like this would only be allowed to live on this forum with analytics, 9 sample size not worthwhile. This thread belongs here instead http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/28...dition-255990/

While I don't think you meant this post as a rant, ACR's bot problem seems largely overstated due to tons of tin foil hat posts on this forum. That being said I don't think anyone would disagree that bots do exist on every site and that sites do need to wage a constant war against improving technology.


As paratrooper said here, people aren't just talking about run good occurrences. I spun back to back $6200 spins on ACR for the $2100 main event (was about a 1 in 165 occurence or 1 in 20000 occurence back to back) no post. People win the ACR million MTTs no post. People have won the max prizes in Jackpots no post.

The people who I have sharkscoped that I assume are winners generally have winning graphs, the people who I assume as losing generally have had losing graphs.

You have to be careful with noise. Just because a particular group shouts the loudest doesn't mean it should be taken at face value.