Quote:
Originally Posted by bottomset
Someone like meteos doesn't benefit from his super low death rate nearly as well as he should
Has anyone used points system on spring split to see actual rank vs current just draft based on perceived talent ranking
Like I said, I did some research before the draft.
Meteos is clearly the best overall #1 pick and there's not really a discussion about it. He doesn't score the most points in an absolute sense, but no other player dominates his position more than he does.
Last split he scored an average of 21.43 points per game (ppg), while second place (Dexter) scored an average of 17.8 ppg. That's a difference of 3.63 ppg between the best and the second best player in this category.
For the same reason I had Lemonnation as my #2 pick. He was 2nd best Support in ppg last split 17.67 ppg, only 0.14 ppg behind Xpecial (17.81 ppg). 3rd place went to Aphromoo with 15.63 ppg, 2.18 ppg behind Xpecial (2.04 behind Lemonnation)
Let's say you get Bjergsen (best player in absolute ppg last split with 23.25 ppg), and I then get Meteos and Lemonnation. Even if you get the second best jungler and Support (let's disregard Xpecial, since no one knows how well Curse will do), I can now afford to pick the 5th best mid from last split (Link) and still be ~even with you in ppg based on last split.
Bjergsen: 23.25 ppg
Dexter: 17.80 ppg
Aphromoo: 15.63 ppg
------------------------
Total: 56.68 ppg
Meteos: 21.43 ppg
Lemonnation: 17.67 ppg
Link: 17.51 ppg
------------------------
Total: 56.61 ppg