Quote:
Originally Posted by Heya
Hey Gonsa, I was looking at Les Pauls after learning a new USA studio can be had for $800. On the Gibson website I saw, "The Les Paul Studio ’60s Satin body is Grade C." I saw grades of A and AA on other more expensive Les Pauls. http://www2.gibson.com/Products/Elec...60s-Satin.aspx
Do you know much these different grades affect the tone, specifically, on a LP with hot pickups like JB's in it?
I once heard a guy on a youtube vid talking about Fender guitars. He said when Fender gets a shipment of bodies, the custom shop guys get first pick, then the guys building for Fender USA get next pick and the rest are shipped to Mexico and so on. I'm just wondering how much it really matters and if it's a quality that is subject to diminishing returns as far as $$$ spent to sweet tone ratio.
That's probably true. I'm sure at least the Custom Shop gets pick of the litter. To what extent Fender USA gets top choice over Fender Mexico is something I don't know. I know that people on guitar forums debate it quite a bit though.
First thing to keep in mind is that the Fender USA plant in Corona CA is basically about 150 mi across the border from the Mexican factory in Ensenada. There's stories of Mexican folks working at one while their cousin works at the other.
With the bodies themselves the priorities for normal Fender USA and MIM bodies probably have more to do with determining what type of finish it will receive. A nice-looking two-piece body with decent grain would make a decent candidate for a sunburst finish where you see the grain, where an uglier one would probably get a solid finish. There are people who have sanded down bodies and found 3- of 4 pieces glued together and some feel that's not good for tone. I'm not sure that's really the case, and even if it is it's definitely blown out of proportion.
Where I really see the big differences is in the finish and the hardware. All MIMs and most standard finishes are poly (high end can be old-school nitrocellulose which a lot of people prefer, which Gibson uses also). With MIM in particular you see the finishes are relatively thick and it's more common to see little wavy runs if you look close, things like that.
When I have my guitars built they are usually finished with nitro applied very thin and I like the way it wears down over time, and the reduced weight. As the argument goes thinner finishes allow the guitar to resonate better, but for my part I don't feel that a poly finish necessarily makes for a bad sounding guitar. Mentioned it before but the MIM strat body I have has sounded consistently good in a variety of setups and it's just a better guitar overall than the nitro finished green one and my MIJ strat also, and the couple others I've had as well. PRS finishes their stuff in poly and some of their stuff is great.
[Side note: You can buy MIM bodies used on ebay for $50 pretty often and sometimes make a great guitar with them, where USA bodies can cost quite a bit. You can get a decent neck, good pickups and tuners and all and still come out ahead on price.]
As far as hardware the MIMs definitely have cheap electronics, questionable tuners, a perfectly functional but lesser quality type of vintage bridge. To me I think the first two need to be swapped out to make a serious guitar. They have crappy switches and those dime-sized import pots which are very unreliable and the stock pickups are pretty ass.
Underneath it all remember they're just pieces of wood, which vary in resonance and weight and all of that. To some extent it's kind of the luck of the draw.
The luthier who posted ITT could probably weigh in with a far more experienced opinion as I'm sure he's worked on a ton of various Strats about things like that.
Last edited by Gonzirra; 02-27-2012 at 12:50 PM.