Limit 2-7 Triple Draw - 1.50/3
Seat 1 is the button
Seat 1: (31.35)
Seat 2: (50.75) SB
Seat 3: HERO (31.39) BB
*** 1ST BETTING ROUND ***

Dealt to HERO: [7 T T 3 5]

BTN raises to 3
SB calls 3
HERO calls 3
*** 1ST DRAW ***
SB draws 2
HERO discards [T T] draws [7 6]
BTN draws 1
*** 2ND BETTING ROUND ***
SB checks
HERO checks
BTN bets 1.50
SB calls 1.50
HERO calls 1.50
*** 2ND DRAW ***
SB draws 2
HERO discards [7] draws [A]
BTN draws 1
*** 3RD BETTING ROUND ***
SB checks
HERO checks
BTN bets 3
SB raises to 6
HERO calls 6 (Is this a mistake? Taking two to the face drawing 1 to a 7 with a dead 7?)
BTN raises to 9
SB calls 9
HERO calls 9 (obvious call, closing action)
*** 3RD DRAW ***
SB draws 1
HERO discards [A] draws [A] RIP
BTN stands pat
*** 4TH BETTING ROUND ***
SB checks
HERO checks
BTNchecks

pretty bad for sure. you're drawing with a gutshot and you don't have a deuce, and for two bets cold, facing a potential jam, which is what happened.

this is a spot you can hang in there with a wheel draw, but not the draw you have. in 2-7 you wanna be thinking about how live your outs are, who has the key cards, and what kind of low you're trying to make.

When you improve to a 1cd on the flop you should lead.
On the turn it would've gone 2:1:1 and then the two of you would've checked to the button who bets. If SB then doesn't raise you can proceed and if he does you fold for the 2 bets.

oh gosh somehow i misread the draw action

yeah lead after you improve to a D1 after 3/3/3 for sure

well played, except for obvious fold to two bets cold before the last draw

(for those confused, it was 2-2-1 on the first draw)

hah that's funny. i did read it right the first time, then re-read it and confused myself

Yup my fault. Everything is good until the turn disaster.

Fold turn.

Fwiw almost every thread in draw has a comment or suggestion in action while having misread the op, or the op making a mistake.

N.b.d. but a quick re-read never hurts lads