Quote:
Originally Posted by easypil
i always see you put setups which are very unlikely to not foul, because if you put something like Q/A/448 and then you get a Q early on i guess you're just gonna stick it uptop and hope to get an A and two pair on bottom.
The thing with OFC is, the more aggressive you play, the more often you will foul but the more frequent you will score big hands. The variance is a lot higher. It's down to your own personal play style.
Some players like to play safe so that they win in the long run by scoring from fouling players and minimising their own variance. You sound like such a player. This is a perfectly acceptable way to play.
Others see more value is gunning for big royalty hands. Obviously with FL in play they will shoot for it with every chance.
Even without FL, pairs such as tens and higher up top are worth as much (and more) than flushes and boats in the back and, if you play intelligently and know when to take the gamble, are often easier to hit.
A set such as x/66/AJT gives you a high 2pair chance or a broadway draw in the back, but no freedom to gain royalties in the top hand, and typically you'll just be throwing dead and unsatisfactory cards there.
Setting it J/A/66T gives you the chance to pair jacks to kings up top (6-8pts) an all you need is to hit the ace and a 6 or T to do so. The other advantage is that along with this high royalty (or FL draw, if applicable) up top you are also drawing to a boat in the bottom. That could be another 6pts.
By setting it safer yes, you are minimising your chances of fouling, but you are also closing the chances of scoring big royalty hands that are not any less likely to hit than the safe set.
Apologies for the long post.