Quote:
Originally Posted by SpewArtist
Excellent post Scotch.
I meant more like if your xcall patting all combos of T9xxx to 97xxx, then that is a lot of combos overall (more if we include some Jx Qx). Obviously we will xcall break a good portion of them as well.
But don’t we want some combos in this set to XR also? Are you saying you’ll only XR 96xxx+ and xcall (pat or break) all worse?
This can’t be the case right? How do figure out what combos play better as XR or xcall pat?
I’ve seen ranges with various combos in each (XR/Xcall pat) but I don’t know why they were chosen or if it even makes sense to balance them this way.
Oh no I would never have a pure linear c/r c/c line like that, I’ve come up with what I think is best using logic, math, and differing among player types and ranges but some 8s are c/c, some 9s are c/r, and some Ts are c/r as well.
Anyhow, it happens frequently in poker where we have a capped range OOP and have potential to be in uncomfortable position where we really only beat bluffs, and the guy isn’t bluffing often but the pot is offering really good odds. It happens a lot in Razz for example.
So it seems as if there is an ultra aversion to facing these spots in 27TD because it seems like you are putting yourself there by patting more and obviously not being super strong. But in doing so you are preserving so much equity, and at the end of the day there’s nothing really your opponent can do about it in a Limit game