Quote:
Originally Posted by GrindPokerAllDay
Neither. I prefer Cena beating Bryan questionably/illegitimately. John Cena not being happy with the way it went down and giving Daniel Bryan a rematch. Then Daniel Bryan could win the title back or better yet if hell froze over in an ideal world John Cena could retain the title by cheating and turning heel. That would make Daniel Bryan grow even more popular and would setup future matches.
In short, Daniel Bryan and John Cena are the biggest stars in the WWE right now by a mile and they should always be in the mix. Sure, throw in guys like Orton/Wyatt/Triple H/Lesnar/Whoever into the mix and even take Cena out of the mix for 1 PPV but to have John Cena out of the mix for any longer than that is unacceptable IMO.
Well, for starters, every time the thought "John Cena turning heel" comes to mind, take that as your cue to wake up and change the sheets. It just isn't happening so it isn't even worth fantasy booking.
Beyond that, I get your impulse, I really do, but I think you're too rigid and doctrinaire about it. With the limitations you've set forth, you would have a hell of a time booking an interesting 12 months of wrestling with a monthly PPV booking model. I'm willing to be proven wrong if you wanted to try to lay out 12 months of just the main events in a way that sounds watchable, but I don't think it would work.
Blood feuds are a thing that will and should happen in a worked fighting sport, and while I do think that the world title should be the ultimate goal of basically every wrestler, I also think there's plenty of room for realistically getting sidetracked and voluntarily focusing more on getting back at your sworn enemy as a temporary higher priority than being the champion.