Quote:
Originally Posted by SarcasticRat
It had two rumbles and all title matches with good workers who are over with the crowd. There was no filler on paper. So I stand by my take regardless of how you felt about the actual outcome.
I'm like 99% sure this forum would have been crapping on everything in the Attitude Era too. It's actually comical.
I think it's worth noting the Attitude Era was 20 royal rumbles ago-- it's fair to say they've run out of ideas in the past two decades, so us saying they suck now isn't necessarily the same thing as us simply hating everything no matter what.
I mean, with the constraint of "the winner must headline WM," they really boxed themselves in.
Of the 30 entrants, only 2 or 3 are legitimate contenders, and therefore their own rules make it hard to construct an entertaining match since everyone knows almost everyone has zero chance of winning.