What's the problem with Langston's finisher?

Maybe the news they got was they are going to create a "world's strongest tag team" with E and Henry?

As for Big E,I wouldn't change much. His finisher could be better, but it's good enough for now, he needs a "you can't see me" crowd pump move and a new theme would be good.

But his look is great, his ability is strong for how short a time he had been in the company and if Orton proves nothing else it is that ****ty mic skills won't hold you back much. I'd give him a load of suplex moves and a theme similar to Mark Henry and make him this generation's Taz, but that is just my opinion.

Big E just needs to bring his 5 count gimmick to raw

It looks turd?

Spot on again Phill.

FYP

The Batista airport pic is so predictable yet still delivers the Lols.

apparently the botchtista return is confirmed by the wwe for 1 run + to help promote guardians of the galaxy

I wouldnt pay to see GOTG even if they brought in Karen Gillan to get shining wizard'ed by AJ.

This.

When news/rumours about Batista come around i and already smiling when i see the spoiler tag knowing its the airport pic.

the current expected RR winner:

most places are saying reigns or punk are the favorite

as of today it's botchtista/orton for the belt and punk/h for the lulz. cena/bray now starting to make more sense in a daniel bryan on a pole match

leaving reigns/taker?

wow if they pull the trigger on that

just so many totally safe level 1 ways to pull off a huge amazing event

well that sucks

I still think cena/taker is the most intriguing match they could do.

I think they might go with Brock/Taker for wm

I think there is a really high chance that they have put Bryan in the Family specifically to have another Cena vs Bryan match.

If the end goal here is Cena is the number one star and they want a match and feud that people will buy into and Cena specifically will want then putting in Bray Wyatt was always a really goofy choice. No one cares about Wyatt and no one could ever think he is going over Cena.

By the by, I think Reigns is winning whatever match he is put in to start another streak off so there is no chance he is in a match with Taker. I think Shield doing a triple threat as some kind of "who is the best?" gimmick to it to start the downfall of the team would be an awesome choice but I think it is pretty likely they are putting Reigns over in the Rumble as rumours have called.

If so, its Reigns vs Lesnar (c), right? I would pay to see that.

some general thoughts:

bryan joining the wyatts is probably going to end up being terribly executed by creative. i can live with a heel turn if it was something cool and played off his charisma like reviving nWo or whatever, but going from #1 face in the company to #2 guy in a mid-card stable is absolutely perplexing. i have a feeling that the turn will be short lived and end when he eliminates bray from the rumble or something like that. also, the whole Wyatt gimmick isn't something that can easily be "receptive" to positive fan reactions either. like i'm just imagining bray wyatt going all tensai and moonwalking to the ring highfiving fans and **** and that would probably be the last time i watch wrestling.

undertaker is never losing at WM. he's especially not going to put a guy like Reigns over who hasn't been in the business nearly long enough to justify such an honor. someone like punk or bryan can at least be labeled as "wrestling lifers" and taker could be convinced to spark their careers by putting them over, but it would be a catastrophe for WWE to push reigns super hard, have him go over taker, and then see him star on some MTV show in a couple years or something. they might push him to the title very soon but tarnishing a guy like taker's career for the guy isn't gonna happen.

lesnar is about to get a monster push and isn't going to lose to anyone, including reigns and taker, anytime soon.

i have no idea how batista is going to fit into things over the next couple months. there are like 8 people who have legitimate WWE title equity right now. maybe if they didnt unify the titles they could put together some interesting storylines/feuds but they absolutely just had to bury it.

Lol, it is definitely true that this is probably the worst time to unify the title as they could easily "world title" strap 6 people not including Batista or like a returning Sheamus etc with them all being high quality credible champs. Rather than elevate the title I could easily see them pass it around like a 5 dollar hooker in 2014. Just between now and WM I think the champs will be Orton lose to Cena lose to Lesnar lose to Reigns or Punk (as the Rumble winner).

Given the state of the WWE, I am pretty sure a face Bray Wyatt is just exactly the same as now, except he is cutting less promos about murdering nuns and attacking bad guys instead of crowd favourites. He is just a current day Boogeyman, except he does a creepy inverted crab walk thing instead of spitting worms into people's mouth.

Word is that the Undertaker has requested his opponent for WrestleMania 30, and the man he has requested to work with is Daniel Bryan. It is not known at this time if WWE has confirmed the request, but a request from Taker in regards to his WrestleMania opponent always carries a lot of weight when making the decision.

Credit: Wrestling Observer Newsletter

This makes Punk and Batista even more likely to win the RR imo. I don't care how big of a push Reigns is getting, they're not going to have him win the RR when he's only had three single matches up to this point.

Wyatt for for RR win hopefully

Sent from my Hudl HT7S3 using 2+2 Forums

Anybody but Punk

I'm laying 3-1 against Wyatt or Reigns winning the RR max bet $50.

sorry i dont speak sports bet. if i take this bet am i routing for or against wyatt/reigns to win.