Quote:
Originally Posted by gusmahler
That's a weird way to put it. Of course it was a crowning of DB. Just like WM 32 was a crowning of RR. Just because Bryan would have lost at SS doesn't lessen the WM moment. Unless you think that Roman losing at SS means he's not being crowned.
That was the wording the writer used in the interview.
Quote:
Originally Posted by True North
I read "crowning" in this sense as making it official that someone is now the clear top guy. DB would not have been crowned at WM32 in that sense. Like Austin was crowned at WM14, but Savage was not crowned at WM4 despite winning the belt because everyone knew Hogan was still the #1 guy.
I'm guessing this is the reason why