Quote:
Originally Posted by derwipok
So I wanted to complain about all the old-timers and announcers in the Rumble but then I wondered who should have been in it. Henry is probably more or less injured so I didn't expect him in, Cena is already headlining Wrestlemania so he doesn't care, Kane doesn't care about matches anyway so no need to put him in the Rumble, Bryan and Punk have the titles so don't need the title shot and I guess they don't want the Funkasaurus to lose a match at this point. Unless I'm missing someone there's no important or semi-important wrestler left to put in.
I don't mind Sheamus winning fwiw.
Henry is a monster and could make the rumble interesting just due to his sheer size, even with limited movement.
Cena should have had an angle where he talked about winning and challenging for the title at EC then facing rock with it to make the wm match bigger. and even if they couldnt you still put cena in the rumble because its JOHN ****ING CENA and he makes it good due to his sheer indestructability.
kane has the most eliminations ever and also has the most consecutive rumble appearances ever. the rumble would have been his legacy, built up over 15 years. they just broke that for no reason whatsoever.
bryan and punk could have hinted at unification, which is unbelievably good when y2j, the first ever undisputed champion has just made his return. also they can both actually work and make the match more exciting.
Not even to mention the heath slaters and tyson kidds that work their ass off every day as mentioned above, or the 100s of other special guests they could have brought in. kevin nash would have been infinitely better.
sorry but there is just no excuse for announcers taking up time in the ring. its terrible. reducing the amount of wrestlers by 10 with no reason other than to put more ad space in a paid for event, then taking a further 3 slots out to give to the egomaniac commentators was disgraceful.