Quote:
Originally Posted by biggiepantz
No, I mean the rules agreed upon (unspoken) say the cards are unmarked in any way. Is my point.
Blaming the victim speaks for itself, I think. I felt a lot of people are doing that: just because you can exploit the casino in some way, it is fair game to do so. I feel people also do this because they think a casino some faceless thing with unlimited means.
Ah, okay...I see your point now, didn't really follow what you were saying. Thanks for clarifying. I still think they almost for sure knew what they were doing (or rather, thought they did.) I personally don't look at a casino as a faceless thing per se, but as a business; and, quite frankly if they made a bad business decision or failed to train/monitor their employees (which I find rather hard to believe) then they made a bad "business" decision and need to pay off...really, I just believe they made a bad business decision on accepting the wagers. But accept them they did, and they should "man up" and accept the consequences of their decision. I'm not a fan of any Full Tilt crony, however, let's face it here...they actually were in full control of what was going on and obviously allowed it to continue for quite some time. My question is why did they. In gambling there's lots of talk of "variance." But when one is actually the house, if variance goes against them its automatically said to be cheating. This seems simply a strong armed version of sour grapes and eff you cause we can. They could have and should have ended it fairly quickly. To think they weren't aware what was going on in every detail (especially at those stakes) is naive imho.
None of my own equally naive opinions are really directed at any one else's either btw...just my opinion.
Last edited by jamthe3; 07-31-2013 at 04:36 AM.
Reason: .