4/8$ stud game. tell me how you would play it differently and what your thought process is and what you think villains have





Player A brings it in with 3c showing
Player B 8c calls
You are dealt 2c3d7d call
folds to player C with xx 9spade who completes
plYER A WHO BROUGHT IT IN WITH xx 3c raises to 8$
player B with xx 8c calls
me call

Player C xx9c4c bets 4
PlayerA - xx3c8d raises to 8
Player B-xx8c7h
me 2c3d 7d5d-Raises to 12
Everyone else calls your bet

PlayerA xx 3c8d8h bets 8
PlayerB xx 8c7hQc calls
me 2c3d 7d5dTh call
player C xx9s4s4d call

Player B xx 8c7hQc8schecks
me 2c3d 7d5dTh6d bet 8
Player C xx 9s4s4d5h calls
Player A xx 3c8d8hQh calls

player B- xxx 8c7hQc8S checks
me 2c3dTs 7d5dTh6d bets 8
Player C xxx 9s4s4d5h calls
Player A folds xxx 3c8d8hQh (what did he have on 3rd? did he fold a bad 2 pair here??)
Player B xxx 8c7hQc8s calls (he has 2 pair here right? but what?? do you think he has?)

sorry for confusing typing, just wanted to know what your thoughts on play was and what you think villains had

Looks standard to me

I wouldn't 3bet 4th without a straight draw or ace, but other than that it looks fine.

Player A likely had osmething like 3-to-a-wheel and ended up with just 88 so he folded facing the open 44 of the guy who started with a 9, Player B either called praying with an 8 low or 2p. C should have Somethings and 4s.

Would it be terrible to fold 3rd after the bring-in makes it 2 bets?

player b likely just made a stupid bet on 5th with a pair + lo draw

I would have folded. Our hand is very marginal so I assume the limp was an attempt to try and realize equity in a small pot. But now it escalated quickly and calling two bets as an equity dog where we have no real gin cards on 4th is not appealing to me.

i know this doesnt help but iirc he has a pair of 8s heading into 5th or 6th I think