Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register

12-01-2014 , 04:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by daveygravy
Dec 15th.

1-2 60/300
1-3 100/500
2-5 200/1000
5-10 500/2000
Weeeeeeee this should be fun
Quote
12-01-2014 , 05:55 PM
Davey,

Will the chinese poker tables also open up on the 15th? Pineapple and regular ofcp?
Quote
12-01-2014 , 06:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by daveygravy
Dec 15th.

1-2 60/300
1-3 100/500
2-5 200/1000
5-10 500/2000

2/5 at 200 to 1k is a much better game than 100 to 500...if the bi is too high stay at 1/2



Sent from my SM-G900V using 2+2 Forums
Quote
12-01-2014 , 06:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by daveygravy
Dec 15th.

1-2 60/300
1-3 100/500
2-5 200/1000
5-10 500/2000
Why is there much overlap in the ranges? I know it's customary but why not match bankrolls better? Like this :

1-1. Max $100
1-3. 100/500
5- 10. 500/1000
10-20 1000/2000
Quote
12-01-2014 , 07:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by midas
Why is there much overlap in the ranges? I know it's customary but why not match bankrolls better? Like this :

1-1. Max $100
1-3. 100/500
5- 10. 500/1000
10-20 1000/2000
Because people are habitual and if you stray to far from what they're used to and comfortable with in the majority of the the poker rooms you run risk. I think they're restructuring the most secure way they can. It will be interesting.
Quote
12-01-2014 , 07:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by [x] swanny
2/5 at 200 to 1k is a much better game than 100 to 500...if the bi is too high stay at 1/2



Sent from my SM-G900V using 2+2 Forums
I really don't think this restructuring is going to change many peoples buyins all that much. Thinking regulars obviously know its advantageous to buy in deeper but the everyday Joe who just wants to come play 2/5 will still buy in for $500-$600 or less and top off or rebuy. I'm most interested in what the 1/3 lineup will look like but happy to be able to buy into the 2/5 deep as well.
Quote
12-01-2014 , 07:42 PM
From ny experience when other rooms I played in went from 500 to 1K max only a few bought in for max and most people still bought in for their same 500 dollar buy in


Sent from my SCH-I535 using 2+2 Forums
Quote
12-01-2014 , 07:52 PM
Isn't the max buy in at 2-5 currently $600?
Quote
12-01-2014 , 09:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDarkElf
Isn't the max buy in at 2-5 currently $600?
Yes, for 2 more weeks.

I'm interested to see if the 2/5 player base changes but I can't really see much of a change, as mentioned some will continue to buy in at the 500-600 range and most will be at or near 1K.
Quote
12-01-2014 , 09:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by midas
In cash NL, blinds don't matter, buy-ins and stack sizes are the main issue.
Who are the players that Sands is trying to satisfy by adding 1/3? Are there really a lot of players who want to buy in for $500 but aren't willing to play 2/5?
Quote
12-01-2014 , 10:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NickMPK
Who are the players that Sands is trying to satisfy by adding 1/3? Are there really a lot of players who want to buy in for $500 but aren't willing to play 2/5?
Thats a good question but I think the 1/3 is a competative experiment. Think the root reason behind the restructuring is to stop the 5/5 & 5/10 conflict.
Quote
12-01-2014 , 11:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by [x] swanny
2/5 at 200 to 1k is a much better game than 100 to 500...if the bi is too high stay at 1/2



Sent from my SM-G900V using 2+2 Forums
This is the exact reason why initially don't like the change. Recreational players will wonder over to 2/5 and see the stack sizes way higher than usual, and be afraid to sit. I don't have a lot of experience with stake changes, so maybe this isn't so. I guess we'll have to wait a few months to see what happens.

However, I do like the fact that there will be deeper play overall.
Quote
12-01-2014 , 11:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by trixter23
This is the exact reason why initially don't like the change. Recreational players will wonder over to 2/5 and see the stack sizes way higher than usual, and be afraid to sit. I don't have a lot of experience with stake changes, so maybe this isn't so. I guess we'll have to wait a few months to see what happens.

However, I do like the fact that there will be deeper play overall.
I understand that point but honestly how many recs will walk over to a 2/5 and not sit because of stack sizes? Better chance they have been thinking about it for a while or are moving up because of a friend is sitting at 2/5 and convinces them it's much better than 1/2.
Quote
12-01-2014 , 11:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by badboynyc
I understand that point but honestly how many recs will walk over to a 2/5 and not sit because of stack sizes? Better chance they have been thinking about it for a while or are moving up because of a friend is sitting at 2/5 and convinces them it's much better than 1/2.
More likely they will play the "in between" game - 1/3.
Quote
12-02-2014 , 12:01 AM
That's true they wouldn't even make it to the 2/5 they would just check out 1/3 first. I don't know what's going to happen but I'll give it a few sessions once it changes and let you guys know how I feel about it then.
Quote
12-02-2014 , 12:16 AM
When does the 10/25 game typically start on tues/fri?
Does it run on other days/how long does the game
Usually run for?
Quote
12-02-2014 , 01:24 AM
I think this system will be fine as long as 1/3 actually runs. Parx tried doing this same thing and the 1/3 never got off the ground.
Quote
12-02-2014 , 01:30 PM
It won't get off here either
Quote
12-02-2014 , 02:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NickMPK
Who are the players that Sands is trying to satisfy by adding 1/3? Are there really a lot of players who want to buy in for $500 but aren't willing to play 2/5?
+1.

In my $1/$2 NL sample size most players don't BI for $300, so I would expect the same at $1/$3. Otherwise most movers will opt for $2/$5 NL, imo - especially for the extra $0.30/hr comp
Quote
12-02-2014 , 03:15 PM
I know 2 players who are very excited about the 1/3. If it's not popular, so what we have a deep 2/5 game now

Sent from my SCH-I535 using 2+2 Forums
Quote
12-02-2014 , 05:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by samo
+1.

In my $1/$2 NL sample size most players don't BI for $300, so I would expect the same at $1/$3. Otherwise most movers will opt for $2/$5 NL, imo - especially for the extra $0.30/hr comp
Is that true extra .30hr for 2/5? Confirm please...
Quote
12-02-2014 , 06:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PASANDSMAN
Is that true extra .30hr for 2/5? Confirm please...
Im not certain but I put in 20 hours this month at 2/5 from a 0 comp balance and ran good on my weekly $10 slot play and have $27 comp dollars now. It seems like it may be $1/hr.
Quote
12-03-2014 , 08:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PASANDSMAN
Is that true extra .30hr for 2/5? Confirm please...
I only play poker and have received $1/hr comp at $2/$5 NL. I'm not certain if $1/$2 NL comp is still $0.70.
Quote
12-03-2014 , 04:14 PM
any chance of getting any more details on the main event or the side events in january such as starting stacks, level lengths?

thanks
Quote
12-03-2014 , 05:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JackHallow64
any chance of getting any more details on the main event or the side events in january such as starting stacks, level lengths?

thanks
Davey usually posts that info as the events get close, the website just has the dates and buyins for now.
Quote

      
m