Quote:
Originally Posted by AlanBostick
LOL at the idea that Bay Area poker rooms don't use Bravo because of state regulation or taxation. If that was the case, why are the Los Angeles cardrooms on Bravo? Same state regulation, same state taxation.
My understanding that the reason Bay Area poker rooms do not use Bravo is because of a gentleman's agreement among Bay Area cardroom operators that they will not do so. When one talks to a cardroom manager to suggest using Bravo, the typical answer is that the cardroom does not want to lose customers to another cardroom on a given day simply because the waits are shorter elsewhere.
A further complication is that because of municipal ordinance, the cardrooms in San Jose may not incentivize or reward play. No discounts for food, no comp dollars, no jackpots, and so on. Bay 101 and Casino M8trix are thus further disincentivized to ue a system like Bravo for player tracking (because comp dollar rewards are the incentive to players to use the tracking player cards). The San Jose cardrooms are the 900-lb gorillas in the Bay Area poker market, and if Bravo cannot work for them, they would really like to make sure that Bravo is not used by anyone else.
This is all correct, and anyone suggesting otherwise is simply uninformed.
Regarding the "gentleman's agreement," the GM of the Oaks told me essentially the same thing years ago. He doesn't want someone to check an app and decide not to come in because the particular game he wants to play isn't running. He wants that player to show up and play in one of the games that
is running—either that or help start the game he wants.