Quote:
Originally Posted by Cory Brown
1. I was involved in a hand where I was in the BB and called a small raise from late position with A8 suited. I call small flop and turn bets and the river is checked.
Basically, I was involved in a pot with a guy I really wanted to be in pots with but eventually ended up with ace high and when it went check check on the river I looked at him to turn his hand over. He had his headphones on and just stared at me. I don't mind turning my hand over because I am never embarrassed as some people are but I wanted to know the ruling. I am under the impression that the player who made the last aggressive action has to expose their cards first. Meaning since he made the last bet it's on him. I was told that's not the rule at Riverwind except in all in situations if I called his all in (standard).
Is this standard elsewhere? This issue isn't that big of a deal but just curious as the general rule of thought.
It's more common than you would think. I agree it's a dumb rule. It used to be the rule at Winstar (Riverwind's sister casino) but they changed it a while back to be last aggressive action. That being said, like most rules in poker there is still a chance the enforcement of the rule could vary depending on who is dealing and who is working floor at the time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cory Brown
This next issue is a big one in my mind. The same player requested a table change (not a must move game) and the floor actually requires players to buy down to the buy in of the transfer.
Further explained. If you are playing 2/5 with a buy in from $200-$500 and you get up to $1000. If you request a table change you HAVE to pocket at least $500 but could pocket $800 and buy in short for $200. Basically, to exploit this, you could keep buying in short, doubling up, changing tables to pocket the money. Rinse and repeat.
This rule seems very backwards to me, I know this is not the standard at other casinos and in fact it's usually required to keep all money on the table. Is this becoming the new norm or any logical reason for it?
No, this is not a new norm. Only other casino I know that does this is Winstar. I'm sure part of the logic behind the rule is that they don't want to deal with the enforcement of players going North when they change tables. This rule is much easier to enforce.
For one to really exploit this in their favor they would need to be a good short stacker, and fortunately there is only one good live shortstacker in the entire state of Oklahoma so I don't think you need to worry too much about that. Sure, bad players could potentially limit the amount they can lose in any one hand but it's really not a big deal (ie the best players generally build stacks staying at one table and their winrates don't appear to suffer as a result of this rule). BTW, in Vegas you can double up and change poker rooms...in other poker rooms you can double up and change levels or double up and come back in an hour. This isn't much different.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cory Brown
Anyone have any luck trying to change poker room rules in Oklahoma?
For the most part, I believe the answer to that question is no. That being said, rules do change from time to time so I'm not going to say it's impossible.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cory Brown
Tl;dr - Results of the session, playing at a table with a lot of players I would like to play 24 hours a day with - obviously I lost.
I've never actually played at Riverwind but I did stop by the poker room last week. Not sure what's up with that little room but it felt to me like they took a bunch of a poker tables and tried to cram them all into a phone booth. I entered the room, looked around, saw a couple faces I knew but overall everyone had an "I want to kill myself" expression. I couldn't get out of there quick enough. FWIW, I stopped at Kansas Star a couple hours north of Riverwind and that room was quite nice. Too bad they only had 1/3 running on a Friday night though.