First off, thanks to everyone who posted a review. It's been very helpful. I plan on going down the weekend of the 14th and I now have a much better expectation. I'll write a review on my return.
Quote:
Originally Posted by WittyPokerPun
Waitresses are gorgeous, easily the best in the city, and better than Parx IMO. Also the clientele includes a LOT of attractive women in their 20s, all congregating around the center lounge.
Thanks goodness for eye candy!
Quote:
Originally Posted by WittyPokerPun
The rules on the table games are slightly unfavorable compared to Borgata. Revel seems to hit all soft 17s at BJ. I couldn't find any tables that didn't. At Borgata you have the entire pit near the hotel elevators that stands on soft 17.
Craps odds were only 3-4-5, which is ridiculous for a megaresort. Maybe they are waiting to get their $50 million credit line they're applying for before they up the variance on the craps games. All craps tables are $5-$2500 with 3-4-5 odds. They're located in a prime location right across from the main seating area of the central bar and lounge.
Some other minor issues with the table games are things like lesser odds offered on the carnival games (specifically 3-card poker, which pays 3-to-1 on the flush, 40-1 to 1 on the SF, and has no mini royal. Compare to Borgata which pays 50 on the SF and 100 on the mini.).
Also, at pai gow poker, the player may NOT bank, because (I am not making this up), the pit boss could not find any banker buttons for the table.
Revel also does not offer "EZ" (No commission) mini-bacc, which is slightly better for the banker bettor than the standard game.
As much as I was reading this for the poker room, this note is by far one of the most interesting I've read in the thread. I don't play against the house but here's my reaction...
Your observations mean that Revel would rather create more action as a lure to get people into the resort rather than make every penny it can off the games. It's a very interesting strategy that reminds me of what I've read about old school Vegas (50s and 60s): namely, the house would be willing to lose money in certain areas (such as the food or shows) because they knew they would get it back and then some in the casino. They were really focused on service back then. This seems to be a return to that but in a different form. The strategy seems to be: Create action and buzz in the casino and people will want to come and party there (along with the amazing atmosphere and amenities). This seems like a winning strategy to me. Expect a huge buzz from this, IMHO. They want those games to be fun!
Quote:
Originally Posted by WittyPokerPun
What might be harder to fix is the main problem with the room. It is super inconvenient to a) find and b) walk to. I mean, you just can't get there. ... Casual players will have to think of playing poker themselves -- there is a zero percent chance anyone could wander to the poker room from off the main casino floor.
This echos other reports and perhaps they'll move the poker room in the future like they did at the Borgata. While playing against tough players has it's place, it's all about the fish....
Last edited by p0k3rhack3r; 04-07-2012 at 08:43 AM.
Reason: minor grammatical cosmetics