Quote:
Originally Posted by JONATHANM
100BB
I myself wouldn't sit at a $50/$100 7cs with <10k, but I'm a nit. Also,that benefits the 5/10 IMHO (maybe make it 50/100+10/25?). I haven't seen the game, would be fun to watch with close to 100k on the table.
Speaking of which, are there thoughts of "walling" off a higher limit area? Not that I'll be playing in a High limit area any time soon. Somewhere away from the front so as not to attract the odd railer, but welcome the occasional reg railer? A wall similar to the one that separates BR from CR (but nicer) that has 6 or so tables behind it maybe?
Was referring to the stack size for the NL half (and meant to say "bb" for "big blind", not "BB" for "Big Bet"), where stack size is more relevant. $10k = 1,000 big blinds at 5-10 NL. Most guys are sitting with what I'd say is around 3k, which gives them 300 big blinds for the NL and 30 big bets for stud. I'd say a 30 big bet stack is more than big enough for any fixed limit game (assuming you have the ability to reload if you get short) -- it's not like you're going to be able to felt someone on any particular hand.
There was talk of kicking the NL half up to 10-25, but there were a couple objections. In particular, some players would prefer it to be straight stud, and are only tolerating the NL half so as to get the stud in.
Not sure what the "BR" and "CR" refer to, but there is a half-wall in the back, where this game was spread. It's easy to walk past, and people could rail the game if they really wanted to, but there's definitely a line of demarcation. Railing hasn't been a problem at all so far, but you're right that it could become one in the future if the game becomes super-popular and/or deeper.