Quote:
Originally Posted by Buggle
Article in the NYT yesterday suggesting Rikers would be the perfect 3rd venue, as the prison is closing. I think this'd be amazing, right next to LaGuardia. Anyone coming in or out of NYC could tack a few hours on prior to their departure and visit the poker room.
The island is, as is pointed out in the piece, mostly landfill. It's likely a toxic mess. Ingress/egress is a nightmare. There's no direct rail access to LaGuardia so creating rail access to Rikers is unlikely if not completely off the menu. Traffic is a nightmare even without a casino there. It is more suited for industrial/warehouse/shipping than a luxury destination.
Anyone who knows the area knows that the LaGuardia project has taken years and is nowhere near done and the 678 to JFK has been undergoing repairs for years. The neighborhood roads can't handle any significant traffic and the residents are not going to be warm to the idea of a casino in their backyard.
Also, the idea that Rikers will close in 2027 is fantasy. It is scheduled to close then but much has been written (and those in charge acknowledge) that the city is likely to miss the target date. If you've followed NYC politics, you know that the plan to close Rikers is dependent on the construction of jails in the boroughs. the Manhattan jail project is running into all kinds of political opposition and though it's moving along, it will face all kinds of hurdles in the upcoming years, likely delaying the 2027 closure plan.
More realistically, whatever is built at Rikers, if anything ever is, will probably be complete in 2030 at the earliest and likely much later.
Whether a casino is built in NYC is one question, but whether it's built at Rikers is another. And the latter question is a resounding: Not a chance.