Quote:
“This is very simple — all forms of legalized wagering in the Commonwealth now have the same rule that is consistent with the [Internal Revenue Service’s] rules,” said state Senator Stanley Rosenberg, an Amherst Democrat and one of the architects of the 2011 Gaming Act.
That's hilarious. The only thing it has in common with the IRS rule is "$600". The IRS has a million exceptions (most importantly, the 300-1 requirement--it doesn't trigger withholding for someone who wins a $600 even money bet, for example), where it sounds like MA does not.
Wow wow wow.
The best part is that the quote above comes from the "architect" of the state's Gaming Act. That's the kind of leadership we can expect.
When I tell people I'm waiting for MA or NH to get casinos so I can move back home, they usually ask, "Why not CT?". I tell them the CT casinos aren't very close to my hometown in NE MA, but more importantly, they're run so terribly, I wouldn't want to work there. I'm starting to feel the same say about the MA casinos, which don't even exist yet!