Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Mohegan Sun (Uncasville, CT) Mohegan Sun (Uncasville, CT)

06-07-2010 , 02:43 PM
no offense meant by this but this is why poker games will never dry up. There are even winning players over time that have such fundamental flaws and leaks in their game not to mention losing players. There will always be spots to make money.
Mohegan Sun (Uncasville, CT) Quote
06-07-2010 , 02:43 PM
[QUOTE=ImDaMan;19408023]"Older Guy hit a set".

Quote:
Originally Posted by IWearSportsJerseys
Do not mess with him--he is actually a good buddy of mine, and he is a Nit with a capital "N". Placed him on the 8s as soon as he smooth-called you, and a nice laydown on your end, for certain!

Wow, "Older Guy" and "Nit with a capital "N". I'm feeling quite flattered.

Mossy, good laydown with top two against my set of 8. I'm not sure I can laydown top two there, even as "Nitty" as I am. I can't remember how exactly the hand played out (old age - memory goes first), but I remember I played it kind of strange cuz I wanted Mr. Spew that was between us not to fold....I knew he'd make his move and stack-off. I did like the "Bo Knows" shirt - Bo was the man. I didn't know who you were until later in the session.

I was heads-up with IWSJ one hand, and I tried this "nervous twitch/feign folding" action to try and get a read off him, but I got no reaction; it was as if he was familiar with the move

IWSP: rough nite for you, but I know you'll bounce back....and lot's of class in handling the coolers.
Yeah when you called my c/r I knew I was definitely behind, was hoping to iso the spew kid....I think I played the hand bad overall though considering my position (sb).
I'm sure ill play with you more this summer.
Mohegan Sun (Uncasville, CT) Quote
06-07-2010 , 02:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by IWearSportsJerseys
We were both stuck at that point, but you were treated to seeing just how snakebitten I was. At least you know that I take coolers well, though :P.
Lol ya you took them well. I usually shrug when I take beats like that too...when you see so many hands online getting sucked out on isn't as bad live anymore.
Mohegan Sun (Uncasville, CT) Quote
06-07-2010 , 02:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrmossy84
Lol ya you took them well. I usually shrug when I take beats like that too...when you see so many hands online getting sucked out on isn't as bad live anymore.
As a converted online player, +1 to this
Mohegan Sun (Uncasville, CT) Quote
06-07-2010 , 02:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kenneth Bania
wow this has to be a level or something. what makes u think avg pot size has anything to do with the situation. the size of the pot, the amount u have to put in the pot and the equity your hand has absolutely kills every argument u have for folding aces
I think I may understand what toothpick is trying to say. I remember reading somewhere that a mistake some players make is to play AA in pots that are too large. What the writer meant was that some players overvalue AA and forget it alone is still only 1 pair and that when facing heavy aggression or multiple players 1 pair often isn't enough. (For example, look at xbeatax's post about "grandma") So those beginning players will oftentimes win small pots with AA because they bet/raise so big but will then lose very large pots when they don't know it is okay to fold them (post flop of course)

If this is what you are thinking of toothpicker, you're right to always be cognisant of the size of the pot and to try to keep the pot size in par with the strength of your hand, but when dealing with AA (in cash games) this only applies to post flop play.
Mohegan Sun (Uncasville, CT) Quote
06-07-2010 , 02:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kenneth Bania
there is a limped pot u have a A3s and you flop a flush draw on a 2 8 T board. First player to act shoves and gets 3 callers all 4 have you covered?? Are you making this call??
Absolutely
Mohegan Sun (Uncasville, CT) Quote
06-07-2010 , 02:56 PM
Ya I think the problem is he keeps talking pre.
I b/f AA on sat night that is no big deal.
Much different than folding them PF
Mohegan Sun (Uncasville, CT) Quote
06-07-2010 , 03:10 PM
This thread has some serious Mohegan logic in it. <3 it, pure lolz.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 27offsuit
****ing math. HOW DOES IT WORK?!
^needsmoreluv
Mohegan Sun (Uncasville, CT) Quote
06-07-2010 , 03:19 PM
ya we are talking about a whole different thing when talking postflop. the hypothetical situation is still an interesting discussion
Mohegan Sun (Uncasville, CT) Quote
06-07-2010 , 03:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kenneth Bania
Theres no way to justify folding AA in a non satty mtt.
You summed up the aces discussion perfectly with this.
Mohegan Sun (Uncasville, CT) Quote
06-07-2010 , 03:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by xbeatax
You summed up the aces discussion perfectly with this.
Almost, but not quite. Substitute "non satty MTT" with Cash Game and it's perfect.
Mohegan Sun (Uncasville, CT) Quote
06-07-2010 , 03:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Future Pro
Almost, but not quite. Substitute "non satty MTT" with Cash Game and it's perfect.
Lol, i misinterpreted it, really bad. Obv there is no justification to folding AA preflop except in a satty. but yaaaaaa my reading comprehension is terrible as of late.
Mohegan Sun (Uncasville, CT) Quote
06-07-2010 , 04:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrmossy84
Ya I think the problem is he keeps talking pre.
I b/f AA on sat night that is no big deal.
Much different than folding them PF
Me too, on a turn with 4 DIAMONDS!!!
Mohegan Sun (Uncasville, CT) Quote
06-07-2010 , 04:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by IWearSportsJerseys
Me too, on a turn with 4 DIAMONDS!!!
So why would you fold the Ad?? lol, jk
Mohegan Sun (Uncasville, CT) Quote
06-07-2010 , 05:05 PM
The way I was running on Saturday, I doubt I would have the A if my hand had 4 aces in it.
Mohegan Sun (Uncasville, CT) Quote
06-07-2010 , 06:30 PM
ya but if the other dude has AA too then you have no outs. and the dudes with lower pairs each have 2 outs. so obv if it's all in all in all in then you can fold cuz you can't improve and you can only win half the pot. don't let these internet nubz call you stupid toothpicker.
Mohegan Sun (Uncasville, CT) Quote
06-07-2010 , 07:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GTL
ya but if the other dude has AA too then you have no outs. and the dudes with lower pairs each have 2 outs. so obv if it's all in all in all in then you can fold cuz you can't improve and you can only win half the pot. don't let these internet nubz call you stupid toothpicker.
I've seen one live pot in my lifetime in which both players had AA.

One player won the pot with a flush .
Mohegan Sun (Uncasville, CT) Quote
06-07-2010 , 07:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ToothPicker
Take it easy. And please support your "not challenged" opinion with correct
math for the hand next time. At the time I folded I was pretty sure that one of my opponents had A,A as well , which was absolutely correct.
Now what quadruple are you talking about?

To addition to, all of you completely ignoring the pot size to compare to
avg pot size you win/play with A,A. And it is one of the most common mistakes in applying math to NL. So what happens when you loose with A,A pot which is more then 5 times of the size of avg pot you play with a pocket A,A?
2 villains one HAS AA.
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 39.278% 02.06% 37.22% 2480984 44898816.00 { AhAs }
Hand 1: 39.278% 02.06% 37.22% 2480984 44898816.00 { AcAd }
Hand 2: 21.444% 21.33% 00.11% 25732148 134604.00 { KK-22, KQs, QJs, JTs, 87s }



3 Villains one has AA.

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 30.654% 01.95% 28.71% 151309720 2232313376.00 { AhAs }
Hand 1: 30.654% 01.95% 28.71% 151309720 2232313376.00 { AcAd }
Hand 2: 19.346% 19.21% 00.14% 1493572880 10712664.00 { KK-22, KQs, QJs, JTs, 87s }
Hand 3: 19.346% 19.21% 00.14% 1493572880 10712664.00 { KK-22, KQs, QJs, JTs, 87s }
Mohegan Sun (Uncasville, CT) Quote
06-07-2010 , 07:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rizasutton
Then you say damn variance. And say ill gladly do it again. Give me any hand where I'm 60%+ to win preflop and ill get it all in with them all day. Put the whole table all in and I'm still correct to call all in.

I'm surprised you say this after reading some of sklanskys books. In one of his books he repeatedly exersizes this thought.

Folding is not correct in cash games. Only in certain situations for tourneys where the payouts some what similiar to top end satellites given certain stack sizes etc.
If I have AA and two players are all in ahead of me and they have identical stacks (to the nickel). 9 players left, top 8 places pay the same amount. 9th gets nothing. I fold aces.
Mohegan Sun (Uncasville, CT) Quote
06-07-2010 , 07:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kenneth Bania
no offense meant by this but this is why poker games will never dry up. There are even winning players over time that have such fundamental flaws and leaks in their game not to mention losing players. There will always be spots to make money.
Guys, girls,
I really would like to see your math backing up your opinion.
Here is details for the hand ( It took place almost 3 years ago at FX):
2/5 NLHE.
Hero: UTG, stack $550, AA
Villain1: UTG+2, $920, AA
Villain2: CO, $2000+, KK
Villain3: Btn, $1200+, J::J:


Hero raise - $40, v1 - $400, v2 - call, v3 - call (claiming it is his lucky hand , and it was )
Hero is pretty sure that v1 or v2 has an A,A and he folds.....

Something beyond trivial odd calculator please.

Anyone???

Last edited by ToothPicker; 06-07-2010 at 07:29 PM.
Mohegan Sun (Uncasville, CT) Quote
06-07-2010 , 07:25 PM
Sorry for the "Calculator answer"


Code:
	equity 	win 	tie 	      pots won 	pots tied	
Hand 0: 	30.392%  	01.86% 	28.54% 	         20156 	   309901.25   { AcAd }
Hand 1: 	30.486%  	01.95% 	28.54% 	         21182 	   309901.25   { AhAs }
Hand 2: 	20.566%  	20.47% 	00.10% 	        222263 	     1085.25   { KcKs }
Hand 3: 	18.556%  	18.46% 	00.10% 	        200434 	     1085.25   { JdJs }

Your equity is 30% and costing you 25%. Net 5% win.

Is it correct if the casino has no max rake? Could the casino take that much of your win?

I think I call JUST for the story!
Mohegan Sun (Uncasville, CT) Quote
06-07-2010 , 07:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by nddst
Sorry for the "Calculator answer"


Code:
	equity 	win 	tie 	      pots won 	pots tied	
Hand 0: 	30.392%  	01.86% 	28.54% 	         20156 	   309901.25   { AcAd }
Hand 1: 	30.486%  	01.95% 	28.54% 	         21182 	   309901.25   { AhAs }
Hand 2: 	20.566%  	20.47% 	00.10% 	        222263 	     1085.25   { KcKs }
Hand 3: 	18.556%  	18.46% 	00.10% 	        200434 	     1085.25   { JdJs }

Your equity is 30% and costing you 25%. Net 5% win.

Is it correct if the casino has no max rake? Could the casino take that much of your win?

I think I call JUST for the story!
if u use the hh with an open raise so its 510 into pot of 2200 so ur paying 23% for at worst 30% equity. only 100 bbs deep makes it even more obvious.
Mohegan Sun (Uncasville, CT) Quote
06-07-2010 , 07:45 PM
...does playing AA preflop really require this much discussion?
Mohegan Sun (Uncasville, CT) Quote
06-07-2010 , 07:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by nddst
If I have AA and two players are all in ahead of me and they have identical stacks (to the nickel). 9 players left, top 8 places pay the same amount. 9th gets nothing. I fold aces.
Well that's nice but we've been talking cash games.

And I agree with your statement above. Buts its irrelevant BC...well were talking cash.

I already stated certain conditions in tourneys can give warrant to folding aa. But that's a different subject.
Mohegan Sun (Uncasville, CT) Quote
06-07-2010 , 07:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by IWearSportsJerseys
...does playing AA preflop really require this much discussion?
LOL I know...and OK I give in. I'm done
Mohegan Sun (Uncasville, CT) Quote

      
m