The Great Outdoors nailed it once again.
There are several obvious reasons why a policy of “report seat-stealers via PM” cannot be an effective solution to this issue:
1) As TGO said, it puts undue burden on players to have to police this stuff. Afaic, the rake we pay should buy us the expectation that fair seating policies will be proactively enforced by staff.
2) It’s hard to believe surveillance is really going to go back and investigate something so minor (from the casino’s perspective) after the fact. And even if they did, it would be a drain on surveillance staff.
3) Best-case scenario, violators will still get away with it for that session.
4) In most cases, a camera review wouldn’t be conclusive enough to warrant any hard action. It’s easy to catch someone stealing chips on camera, not so easy to be sure someone was seat-stealing, given the lack of context about what may have happened away from the table (if the player talked to the floor, etc.).
5) Most of the time, we can’t be 100% sure someone is seat-stealing; but it sure
looks like they are. Are we supposed to report someone we’re only 90% sure stole the seat? That seems unfair, given that he may have gone through legitimate channels. As players, we don’t have access to all the information we need to levy such accusations with certainty.
6) This would be a huge drain on
you, Johnny, to have to read every PM when this happens and waste time dealing with these cases on an individual basis.
You can see why this is an impractical and inefficient proposal. But what’s more is that, even if it somehow worked smoothly on the front end, the policy holds no weight if the floor doesn’t start dishing out consequences…
Quote:
Originally Posted by foatie
These rules and proposed theories to curb the seat stealing are going to do nothing if the floor is going to continue to cowar down to every line jumper as soon as the player makes a mean face and raises their voice in the slightest.
The precedent has already been set, and there's a handful of people who know they can do this and the floor will do nothing if they stand their ground.
Foatie is spot-on here. The precedent has absolutely been set that if you’re stubborn enough or willing to just lie to their face, the floor will concede. Despite seeing seat-stealing happen regularly, I don’t think I’ve ever seen a player get ejected from the casino for it.
There’s a subset of players that, whenever they’re caught in the act, pretend like there’s a language or cultural divide preventing them from grasping the whole “wait your rightful turn” concept. Despite being regs themselves, they just act confused and are thus only given their 110th warning. Zero real consequences are ever dished out. With no fear of punishment, anyone who wants to attempt a seat-steal is freerolling to do so.
We need a system that accomplishes these three things:
1) Provides quick and easy verification that the player was legitimately sent to that seat.
2) Makes the act of seat-stealing much more brazen to attempt and more difficult to pull off.
3) Allows the floor to easily know if a person was attempting to steal a seat, therefore making punishment much easier.
The way someone itt described the seating policy at The Commerce - where every new player/transfer must be personally escorted by a floor who gives verification to the dealer – sounds interesting too. But, given how easy it would be for the staff to start allowing exceptions here and there, it would only be a matter of time before a system like that came crashing down.
Afaic, the seat-card system proposed by The Great Outdoors is the most logical potential solution. The introduction of “hard proof” to the equation allows all sorts of misunderstandings/complications to be bypassed altogether, and gives timid dealers a stress-free way to take a hard-line stance on this issue.
I know your main concern atm is most likely the air quality/fumes issue, Johnny, and that you’re working very hard on that. I appreciate your efforts to tackle that, but I’m sure all the potential solutions for that are costly and complicated. Meanwhile, this issue could be addressed cheaply and in a relatively easy way. The roughest part would be the few weeks of transition until everyone gets used to it.
Another good point TGO made is that the staff is lucky rn to not be hearing more complaints about this in-person. It’s an easy problem to avoid noticing if you’re not already aware and looking for it. People aren’t actively upset about it because they’re ignorant to the fact that it’s going on. When they have to wait an hour and a half for a seat they should’ve gotten after one hour, they don’t know they’ve been wronged.
Thank you for all you do, and for engaging with us here, Johnny.