Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
MGM National Harbor Resort & Casino (Oxon Hill, MD); FAQ in OP MGM National Harbor Resort & Casino (Oxon Hill, MD); FAQ in OP

10-13-2018 , 07:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mdl_player
Hate to continue the complaint, but the corridor from the bar to the bathroom smells like a mix of food/pizza, cleaning products, and lingering bathroom odors. Hope this is just an off day.


No it’s rough over there. Unfortunately I don’t see a solution short of closing Snacks.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
MGM National Harbor Resort & Casino (Oxon Hill, MD); FAQ in OP Quote
10-13-2018 , 08:02 PM
We’re going back to the drawing board on the Snacks issue.
MGM National Harbor Resort & Casino (Oxon Hill, MD); FAQ in OP Quote
10-13-2018 , 08:06 PM
Thanks Johnny. For the record, I would take this inconvenience over Snacks being closed (unless there is a legitimate health concern).
MGM National Harbor Resort & Casino (Oxon Hill, MD); FAQ in OP Quote
10-14-2018 , 12:59 AM
I would take having no Snacks over having irritated eyes, nose and throat...but I doubt closing Snacks was ever up for consideration by management.
MGM National Harbor Resort & Casino (Oxon Hill, MD); FAQ in OP Quote
10-14-2018 , 01:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathlizard888
I would take having no Snacks over having irritated eyes, nose and throat...but I doubt closing Snacks was ever up for consideration by management.


I think they would take out the elevated tables before closing Snacks.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
MGM National Harbor Resort & Casino (Oxon Hill, MD); FAQ in OP Quote
10-14-2018 , 01:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathlizard888
I would take having no Snacks over having irritated eyes, nose and throat...but I doubt closing Snacks was ever up for consideration by management.


I've been home for a few hours now and the smoky smell is admittedly still in my nose (or maybe just in my head after sitting in it for 7-8hrs?) and my clothes definitely smell too MGM National Harbor Resort & Casino (Oxon Hill, MD); FAQ in OP
MGM National Harbor Resort & Casino (Oxon Hill, MD); FAQ in OP Quote
10-14-2018 , 02:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mdl_player
+100


On another note, I have admittedly thought the air fumes complaint was unsubstantiated the past 4-5 times I've played here but today I'm seated near Snacks and it is actually noticeable and not very pleasant.
As I walked out of the casino down stairs, the smell of the fish restaurant was all around the one side of the casino.
MGM National Harbor Resort & Casino (Oxon Hill, MD); FAQ in OP Quote
10-15-2018 , 06:50 PM
Are name tags required to be worn by MGMNH employees?

Sometimes, I would like to know employees names, but I prefer not to ask them.

Some dealers wear a picture ID in a clear plastic sleeve, along with a black and white name tag (which shows a name better than the picture ID). Other dealers just wear a picture ID in a clear plastic sleeve, without having a black and white name tag. And other dealers just wear a picture ID in a clear plastic sleeve, without having a black and white name tag, and they have additional cards in the clear plastic sleeve obscuring their picture IDs.

Ideally, there should be a dress code that states that the picture ID and black and white name tag should be worn. I would also like to think that all poker room employees should be (strongly) encouraged to wear their IDs.

Is this how it is, Johnny? Or are minor issues like this being overlooked because there are more important things about which to be concerned?

Also, a woman working at the front desk has not been wearing any name tags that I could see. I guess that she is an MGMNH employee?
MGM National Harbor Resort & Casino (Oxon Hill, MD); FAQ in OP Quote
10-15-2018 , 08:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCJ001
Are name tags required to be worn by MGMNH employees?

Sometimes, I would like to know employees names, but I prefer not to ask them.

Some dealers wear a picture ID in a clear plastic sleeve, along with a black and white name tag (which shows a name better than the picture ID). Other dealers just wear a picture ID in a clear plastic sleeve, without having a black and white name tag. And other dealers just wear a picture ID in a clear plastic sleeve, without having a black and white name tag, and they have additional cards in the clear plastic sleeve obscuring their picture IDs.

Ideally, there should be a dress code that states that the picture ID and black and white name tag should be worn. I would also like to think that all poker room employees should be (strongly) encouraged to wear their IDs.

Is this how it is, Johnny? Or are minor issues like this being overlooked because there are more important things about which to be concerned?

Also, a woman working at the front desk has not been wearing any name tags that I could see. I guess that she is an MGMNH employee?
Not sure which question to address. I would imagine they are both rhetorical. They are required to wear both.
MGM National Harbor Resort & Casino (Oxon Hill, MD); FAQ in OP Quote
10-15-2018 , 09:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyGroomsTD
We’re going back to the drawing board on the Snacks issue.
Does the drawing board include the possibility of a world without Snacks? We managed before; I bet we can do it again.

Satisfy everybody by closing Snacks forever and replacing it with a series of coffee machines and soda dispensers. Absent the replacements, you could also shutter Snacks forever and replace it with a solid wall. That would also work.

We're not (that) greedy, we just want to breathe again without being assaulted by the acrid aroma of whatever is festering in Snacks.

The point here is---Snacks is awful. It was a good idea, but it hasn't worked. Let's move forward...without Snacks.
MGM National Harbor Resort & Casino (Oxon Hill, MD); FAQ in OP Quote
10-15-2018 , 09:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Savage Henry
Does the drawing board include the possibility of a world without Snacks? We managed before; I bet we can do it again.



Satisfy everybody by closing Snacks forever and replacing it with a series of coffee machines and soda dispensers. Absent the replacements, you could also shutter Snacks forever and replace it with a solid wall. That would also work.



We're not (that) greedy, we just want to breathe again without being assaulted by the acrid aroma of whatever is festering in Snacks.



The point here is---Snacks is awful. It was a good idea, but it hasn't worked. Let's move forward...without Snacks.


After Saturday spending most of the day in the elevated area, I had this same thought.

There’s a bar already there. They could try a cold service area with salads/fruit/sandwiches that don’t require cooking. Maybe even soups.

I’m not sure how well the numbers would support that, but it would take care of the air quality issues.
MGM National Harbor Resort & Casino (Oxon Hill, MD); FAQ in OP Quote
10-15-2018 , 10:16 PM
How about walling off snacks so it is it's own room? This would contain the fumes and ventilation fans could be added to prevent it from becoming a gas chamber. You could use glass walls so it's still an openish feeling.

Overall I'm pleased with the room and only want to see it continue to improve. Here is a comprehensive list of some suggestions (not complaints) that I think would really make things even better:

- Have a designated floor or two that's always planted at the middle podium that handles all table change requests for 2/5 (and possibly for all 2/5 seating). I think this was technically the plan but there's rarely ever a floor around the middle of the room.

I've noticed most arguments resulting from table changing is because there isn't a singular method to requesting them. Some players will ask floors walking by and they will eye up a situation and just say "go ahead" and it will conflict with someone who is already on a list to that table. If it was streamlined to just the middle and/or front podium and every table change was personally walked over to the new game it would solve soooo many issues.

- Put a vertical TV with the list at the back of the room behind that brush stand (side of high limit wall). Also put a vertical TV with the list on it inside of Snacks (you can't hear your name being called from there).

- Remove one of the tables from the private room and put in a sofa or something. Two tables is awkward and cramped and rarely both are in use anyway. Just sort of do what the Bike does with the exclusive LATB room.

- Extend the border railing around the entire room out 1 full yard to make the outer tables less cramped. The hallways will still be plenty wide.

- Replace the chairs eventually with a new chair brand. 30-40% of the chairs in the room are semi-broken with the backs flying back and providing no resistance. People are relegated to constantly swaping them out for working ones.

- Try introducing a 5/5 NL 30 second shot clock game. 1.5k cap, time-raked, and maybe 1 time extension chip given out every dealer change? Maybe offer it rake-free or rake-reduced and only on a set day/time for a month to pilot test it. No idea if it'll work but it could be interesting.

- Abolish the Mississippi straddle for NL games
MGM National Harbor Resort & Casino (Oxon Hill, MD); FAQ in OP Quote
10-15-2018 , 11:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Savage Henry
Does the drawing board include the possibility of a world without Snacks? We managed before; I bet we can do it again.

Satisfy everybody by closing Snacks forever and replacing it with a series of coffee machines and soda dispensers.
Or put in a bigger bathroom!

A room with 400+ people should have a bathroom with more than a couple of stalls. Right?
MGM National Harbor Resort & Casino (Oxon Hill, MD); FAQ in OP Quote
10-16-2018 , 10:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jacmrose
I was thinking this evening as we had 3 players that were continuously buying in for $100 that it would be so nice to have like a 2-3 game with a $200-$500 buy in. There is just so much difference in the 1-3 games depending on what game you are in. You have some tables with 7-8k on them at all times but then some games where everyone is short stacked. I wouldn’t mind a nice middle ground between 1-3 and 2-5 since the 2-5 is so big at MGM. I don’t know if it would garner enough interest but it’s just a thought.
What's wrong with " players that were continuously buying in for $100 " ?
MGM National Harbor Resort & Casino (Oxon Hill, MD); FAQ in OP Quote
10-16-2018 , 12:32 PM
As Havax mentioned, the seating/transfer process at 2/5 remains a significant problem. I commonly see players get up and move themselves to a different table without talking to a floor, bypassing the list of players trying to rightfully transfer over there (or leaving their old table short).

I’ve seen the following a few times as well: during peak times, someone wanders around scoping out tables, and when a seat opens up, they walk up and take it, screwing over the long list of people patiently waiting their turn. They get away with it because no one checks, or they blatantly lie when the dealer asks them if a floor/brush sent them. I appreciate the rare occasions when dealers try to check, but sadly they don’t have the tools to do it.

I think the problem is under-noticed by players and staff because most people aren’t paying attention. Whenever someone claims a seat, everyone (dealer included) assumes it’s legit, and nobody realizes how much thievery is taking place. With no verification system in place, the bad guys win. It probably happens even more at 1/3, where people *really* aren’t paying attention.

The best solutions, imo, are either having a dedicated floorperson who handles all 2/5 seating, or using the table/seat cards similar to when the room first opened. Basically, I think dealers requiring either a seat card or a floor to personally escort all new players/transfers would effectively address this issue.
MGM National Harbor Resort & Casino (Oxon Hill, MD); FAQ in OP Quote
10-16-2018 , 01:20 PM
Just disallow 2/5 transfers all together IMO. It’s unnecessary and serves only to make recreational players feel targeted. Make people have to go to the bottom of the list if they want a new random table.

It’s good for the game to randomly have some tables be tougher than others. The “good” games will stay fun for the recreational players longer without every reg in the room able to transfer there.

Alternatively, allow transfers but unselectively. You get on a transfer list and are unable to select specific tables. Either you take the open seat or have to go to the bottom of the transfer list.
MGM National Harbor Resort & Casino (Oxon Hill, MD); FAQ in OP Quote
10-16-2018 , 01:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Savage Henry
Does the drawing board include the possibility of a world without Snacks? We managed before; I bet we can do it again.

Satisfy everybody by closing Snacks forever and replacing it with a series of coffee machines and soda dispensers. Absent the replacements, you could also shutter Snacks forever and replace it with a solid wall. That would also work.

We're not (that) greedy, we just want to breathe again without being assaulted by the acrid aroma of whatever is festering in Snacks.

The point here is---Snacks is awful. It was a good idea, but it hasn't worked. Let's move forward...without Snacks.

Closing Snacks would be the best idea.
MGM National Harbor Resort & Casino (Oxon Hill, MD); FAQ in OP Quote
10-16-2018 , 03:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ffxplayer
Closing Snacks would be the best idea.

+1


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
MGM National Harbor Resort & Casino (Oxon Hill, MD); FAQ in OP Quote
10-16-2018 , 03:53 PM
Snacks will not be closing. We will find another solution, but we won’t close Snacks.
MGM National Harbor Resort & Casino (Oxon Hill, MD); FAQ in OP Quote
10-16-2018 , 06:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyGroomsTD
Snacks will not be closing. We will find another solution, but we won’t close Snacks.
That's good to hear. I like the convenience of it.

It sounds like all you need to do is eliminate any menu item for which preparation requires making the smoke or whatever the stuff is that is irritating people.
MGM National Harbor Resort & Casino (Oxon Hill, MD); FAQ in OP Quote
10-16-2018 , 07:06 PM
Since its part of my day job, I really still just marvel at some of the HVAC and design decisions that went into the construction of this space - IE a 400 capacity room, 2 bathroom stalls sounds good. But bigger picture, really starting to wonder if everything was done correctly in the first place.

Reading the report from the girl that got electrocuted at MGMNH, they noted that not only was the voltage limiter installed wrong in the wiring but that there were a number of other issues and "major" code violations. Makes me wonder who at MGMNH is making the decisions on what contractors get picked and who gets hired to do this work.

Wouldn't be surprised if at Snacks everything was designed properly but maybe some of the HVAC/ventilation was installed wrong.
MGM National Harbor Resort & Casino (Oxon Hill, MD); FAQ in OP Quote
10-16-2018 , 07:33 PM
since it hasn’t been reiterated ITT recently, it’s important to know:

Johnny doesn’t work for the company that owns and is ultimately responsible for the MGM NH property.

MGM Resorts does not own MGM NH’s land and building, it’s owned by the related REIT, MGM Growth. MGM Resorts only owns 70% of MGM Growth.

what that likely means is, there’s a ton of people that need to sign off on anything JG tries to resolve the issues, and even then potential lost/gained revenue may not even be acknowledged by those who are making the ultimate decisions.

i can’t speculate as to whether the bathroom maintenance issues are related, a good starting point is whether janitorial staff works for Resorts or Growth.
MGM National Harbor Resort & Casino (Oxon Hill, MD); FAQ in OP Quote
10-16-2018 , 07:36 PM
I think I've been pretty clear in previous posts on said topic that I dont hold JG personally responsible for the HVAC or ventilation design and installation in the room.

/s
MGM National Harbor Resort & Casino (Oxon Hill, MD); FAQ in OP Quote
10-16-2018 , 07:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dcmidnight
I think I've been pretty clear in previous posts on said topic that I dont hold JG personally responsible for the HVAC or ventilation design and installation in the room.

/s


yeah nah, wasn’t directing at you, just figured the thread could use the reminder.

you can likely blame smaller building issues on what i said though, such as the handicapped door on P3 being broken for far longer than is reasonable.
MGM National Harbor Resort & Casino (Oxon Hill, MD); FAQ in OP Quote
10-16-2018 , 08:40 PM
Hi Johnny,

I'm a 2/5 player who has played exclusively at MGMNH since its opening day, averaging playing at least 30 hours per week. Overall, this is a great place to play – most of the dealers and staff do a good job, the food comps are generous, the decor/color of the felt/chairs/lighting/etc. is nice, and, most importantly, there are always plenty of 2/5 games running and they have to be some of the best games in the country.

Regarding the new upstairs poker room, I like that we can take the elevators directly there from the parking garage, I like having the option to get food right in the poker room, and I love that you changed from 10-handed to 9-handed games.

Reading through this thread, it is obvious that you are working hard to listen to customer feedback/complaints and trying to improve things; I really appreciate this. Here's my complaint...

In my opinion, there is a huge issue that needs to be fixed at the 2/5 games: the seating of new players, as well as the handling of players transferring to another table. I'm not exaggerating when I tell you that every single day I play poker at MGMNH I see people breaking seating rules and transfer rules. Obviously, this causes many issues of unfairness and leads to tension and discord between players and between players and staff. Here are the main issues, specifically:

- A player walks in the room and does not even put himself on the list (or he's 12th on the list or whatever). He wanders around the 2/5 section and when he sees a seat open up, he simply walks up to the table and gets the seat. This is the number one most infuriating problem of all of this. I can't even tell you how frustrating it is when you are someone who follows the rules, patiently waits for your name on the list, and, meanwhile, dishonest people are just swooping in and stealing seats. And this happens all the time (not just on extra busy Saturdays).

- A player wants to transfer to a different table but does not follow transfer procedures. He just picks up his chips and moves. This is incredibly annoying and unfair to A) other players legitimately on the list to transfer, B) other players at the current table who would like to keep playing with the would-be transfer cheat, and C) other players at the current table who simply would like the tables to remain balanced and the rules to be followed.

- A player cheats in either of the above ways and is caught by another player, who then reports him to the list attendant, dealer, or supervisor. Now a whole new set of problems is created: the cheating player is angry for being “ratted out,” the “rat” is made to feel embarrassed by other players for “complaining” or “wasting time,” the staff has to stop what they're doing to try and handle this situation, and there is a huge negative tension among everyone and sometimes even out loud arguing and yelling.

I have complained and discussed all of this many times with the poker room staff. Most list attendants and supervisors are polite, sympathetic, agree this is a big problem, and seem like they genuinely want to help. Some basically say, “There's not really anything we can do...I'm sorry.” Others offer potential improvements; their answers to my concerns generally go like this:

“We're going to post a permanent supervisor in the 2/5 section and all seating and transfers for 2/5 will have to go through that person. We're announcing 'player in at table x' when we send someone to a table. We're kicking out players for 24 hours when caught stealing seats/transfers.”

All of those things (while good) either have not been done, are not done consistently, and do not at all completely solve the problem. Even a dedicated 2/5 supervisor will not sit there and watch all tables like a hawk and be able to catch all the cheaters. Announcing “player in” is often not even heard by the players/dealers, and in any case doesn't prove at all that the person who sits down is the person who was sent there. While it is encouraging to see players kicked out when caught, it has only been enforced a few times, while the violations happen constantly. Furthermore, the player being reported often has a good idea who reported him and will now be angry and hold a grudge against that player (and against the staff member who kicked him out). Trust me...we don't need to encourage any other reasons for players to hold anger and grudges against each other and staff at a poker room.

In my opinion, the whole punitive-based solution to this problem is not the answer. “You guys let us know when you see someone breaking the rules and we'll fix it and possibly throw them out,” is not an effective solution. Players should be able to simply focus on their game, not on catching and reporting the seat stealers. Staff should be able to focus on doing their jobs efficiently, not on resolving these issues and kicking people out. And, above all, we all want MGMNH poker room to be a place where people can overall have a good vibe, get along with each other, feel like they're treated fairly, and enjoy coming back to (and for the staff, enjoy working at) again and again. Having a “catch and report, kick people out, cause fights, etc.” vibe is not at all what anybody wants. Rather than a punitive-based system, what we need is to prevent the problems from even happening in the first place.

So what should the solution be?

1. You have to have a way where a player is given permission to go to a certain table (whether as a new player or as a transfer).

2. You have to have a way where the dealer asks for and is given proof that the player was sent to his table.

3. This has to be done EVERY single time. None of the, “Oh...the person up front sent me here...” just taking players' word for it type of stuff.

It seems fairly simple to me: use the seating cards. The list attendant/supervisor/whoever sent the player MUST provide the player with a seat card. A dealer MUST ask a new player/transfer for a seat card and refuse to seat him if he can't provide it. Cards have to be used for new players as well as for transfers.

I want to reiterate that this has to happen every single time – staff and players must not become lazy with using the cards; that is the reason this didn't work the brief time MGMNH tried using the cards in the past.

When I've suggested this solution to the staff, many agreed it would mostly solve the problem. They tell me something like, “I'm going to mention this in a meeting with Johnny...” but I never hear any follow up. Others say negative things about this idea, such as (with my answers in parentheses):

- “It wouldn't work because not everybody would use the cards consistently.” (Yes, they would. If the proper culture among all the players and staff at MGMNH was to make it a policy that MUST be followed, then it would quickly become second nature to everyone.)

- “We tried it before, but players stole the cards and tried to use them on other days.” (I doubt this happened very often...my guess is it happened a couple times and is a convenient excuse for not using the cards. Even so, there are ways to catch those people and to punish them appropriately. And to print new cards the rare times it's necessary. I think it would only take once to hear someone was banned two months or something to discourage anyone else from ever stealing a card again. Just because a solution to a huge problem might create another far less serious issue does not mean the initial solution shouldn't be employed.)

- “It's a pain to have to walk around and pick up seating cards.” (You wouldn't have to nearly as much as you might think. Players waiting for a seat/transfer will be ready and willing to run cards up to the front podium. Plenty of players not in a hand currently at their table will be happy to help run a card up to the podium...especially those players always grumbling about “there's a list and we've had a seat open for 15 minutes.” For a staff member, even having to occasionally walk to pick up seating cards is WAY better than having to constantly deal with seating issues/arguments created by not using the cards at all; it's unpleasant enough trying to deal with this as a player...I can't even imagine how awful it must be for the staff to have to resolve these fights and how awkward it must be to have to ban someone or reprimand someone or whatever.

- “We're trying to get Johnny/MGM to get us headset devices so supervisors and list attendants can communicate across the room.” (This is great and I've seen in other poker rooms how it greatly helps everything run more efficiently. That being said, it still wouldn't do much at all to prevent seat stealing. Again, the dealer MUST have a way to be shown quick and easy proof that a player has permission to sit at his table.)

After considering all of that, I hope you can agree with me that the pros of using the seating cards vastly outweigh any cons, and that the excuses for not using them don't really hold much water.

Another nice benefit of using the cards: it's much easier (compared to having to walk up close to a table and look at the Bravo red dots) for everyone to see which tables have open seats with the visual cue of the cards sitting on the empty places at the table. It also gives the list attendants at the front podium another visual cue of what tables have open seats (we could even use some device at the podium where the cards can be neatly organized...I'm picturing some type of clear plastic thing made to display business cards or something. Or you could use a three-ring binder with baseball card protector type sheets; you could use divider tabs for 1/3, 2/5, etc.). As it stands currently, seats often remain open for a good while before the list attendants notice by looking at the appropriate place on their computer screens.

Johnny, MGMNH is a great poker room and you've done a tremendous job with it. Thank you for everything. Using the seating cards (correctly and every time) would fix a huge problem that is causing distress, arguments, unfairness, and inefficiency to many 2/5 players and to the poker room staff. Fixing the seating issues would be a massive improvement to the quality of your poker room and (in this player's opinion, at least) would make it a nearly perfect place to play 2/5.

I understand this was an incredibly long post. I apologize for that, but I felt it was a very necessary and long overdue post. Thank you very much, Johnny, for taking the time to read all of that and for your consideration of everything said. Additionally, thank you to any fellow MGMNH poker players, dealers, and staff who took the time to read and consider all of the things said.

I'm optimistic we can all work together, use the seating cards effectively, and make everything much better for everyone.

Last edited by The Great Outdoors; 10-16-2018 at 08:54 PM. Reason: general grammar editing
MGM National Harbor Resort & Casino (Oxon Hill, MD); FAQ in OP Quote

      
m