Quote:
Originally Posted by AngusThermopyle
I am saying that if you start with a split of:
100 table games
25 poker tables
the decision of how to allot the remaining 15 tables seems rather clear.
Add to that the question of "How many poker tables can the area support?", ie are there enough poker players to fill up another 40 tables.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Didace
Yes. National Harbor is much more convenient than Maryland Live for all of Northern Va and probably anyone inside the beltway. The question is how bad (if at all) this would hurt ML.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Banana man
Doubt it hurts Live too bad. Live is in a much better location overall
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rapini
Based on what?
Quote:
Originally Posted by dcmidnight
Same guy who said that MDL would have no affect on Charlestown?
I play/know a pretty significant number of people at MDL who are from Northern VA and drive right past MGM on the way to MDL or Horseshoe. All things being equal, there is zero chance they are going to drive right by and play at MDL. That round trip is @ 2 hours in wasted playing time.
Obviously "all things being equal" covers a lot of ground. Parking, room size, games etc. But if I look at my favorite places to play in LV - they are all MGM properties that seem to take poker pretty seriously.
That being said, lets not kid ourselves, poker is not a massive money maker for the casino. I'd be happy if there were 35-40 poker tables but most likely I know its going to be closer to 30.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Banana man
lol, no way it has that same affect.
obviously a better location for NoVa people
Quote:
Originally Posted by dcmidnight
I think you'll be surprised how much people are interested in playing in a really nice resort with a really good selection of restaurants, shopping or other things for their spouses.
Or god forbid, play for more than a few hours in a row and stay over.
Just out of curiosity, why do you think MDL is so great that even people who live nearby in MD will continue to go there?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Didace
I'm sure this is true for some people. Just not that many.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rapini
I can't believe people are challenging the strong evidence that banana man has brought to this thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Banana man
Well, let's see. Right now at 2pm on a Wednesday Live has more tables running than any casino in the country. Live has 52 tables which is more than MGM's projected spread. Live is easier to access for at least 80% of Maryland's population.
Do you have anything worthwhile to contribute?
Above is the entire conversation that led us to this point.
Banana man asserts that MGM opening will not hurt Live "too bad" and that "Live is in a much better location overall."
Maryland Live (MDL) is about outside of Baltimore, about 45 minutes to downtown DC and about 20 minutes to downtown Baltimore (not taking into consideration traffic. MDL offers as amenities an outlet mall which is connected to it.
MGM National Harbor (MGMNH) will be about 30 minutes from downtown DC (not taking into consideration traffic). MGMNH offers as amenities luxury shopping, fine dining, a waterfront resort, and a convention center 5 minutes away, not to mention fine dining onsite.
I don't see how MDL is a "much better location overall," especially given the traffic that will come to MGMNH from visitors to DC and convention attendees both at MGMNH and National Harbor. Additionally, getting to MDL via public transit is a challenge while getting to MGMNH will be a breeze in comparison.
As such, I think that Banana man's assertion that MDL is in a much better location is wrong.