Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register

07-01-2016 , 04:08 PM
Your friend should be fine. If he gets at a table he's not comfortable at he can always ask to table change but most tables are pretty mild.
Quote
07-01-2016 , 05:34 PM
If your friend is generally not an a-hole and can keep up with whats going on at the table - not only will he be fine but he will be ahead of the curve at 1/2...
Quote
07-01-2016 , 06:00 PM
Very happy to see the HORSE tournament scheduled for July 13th. I think there is a market for non-hold em tournaments in the region.
Quote
07-01-2016 , 08:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Archibald
Very happy to see the HORSE tournament scheduled for July 13th. I think there is a market for non-hold em tournaments in the region.
What is the buy-in?
Quote
07-01-2016 , 09:33 PM
Howdy all. I'm gonna be moving to the area soon (visiting next week to find an apartment) and would love to visit the casino! Is there a weekly tourney structure that I can check out or should I rely on cash games?
Quote
07-01-2016 , 09:53 PM
Tournament Calendar

Another page
Quote
07-01-2016 , 11:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kimoser22
What is the buy-in?
$200
Quote
07-02-2016 , 01:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dcmidnight
If your friend is generally not an a-hole and can keep up with whats going on at the table - not only will he be fine but he will be ahead of the curve at 1/2...
Quote:
Originally Posted by remmy420
Your friend should be fine. If he gets at a table he's not comfortable at he can always ask to table change but most tables are pretty mild.
Quote:
Originally Posted by EvilGreebo
1/2 at Live isn't really any different from 2/5 at Live. Sometimes you get the drunk ******* but most of the time you just get the usual mix of chatterboxes, table captains and hoodie/headphone mutes.
Thanks everyone. He knows the basics from home games and just wants a relaxing vacation. Doesn't want to deal with folks complaining or getting upset with him for not speaking English.

Doh, The table change tip makes sense - didn't think of that. will pass it on.
Quote
07-02-2016 , 10:13 PM
I'm thinking about playing the $270 6-max tourney tomorrow, but I was looking at the structure sheet, and it is inconsistent with the website. The website says $250 goes into the prize pool, while the PDF structure sheet says only $244. Which is it?
Quote
07-04-2016 , 11:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Archibald
Very happy to see the HORSE tournament scheduled for July 13th. I think there is a market for non-hold em tournaments in the region.
Does anyone know how long these other-than-HE tourneys last? HORSE, O8, O/E, etc? I know that they start at noon and that another tourney starts at 7pm, so given the structure, I'm thinking about five hours. Correct?
Quote
07-04-2016 , 02:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FeliciaLee
Does anyone know how long these other-than-HE tourneys last? HORSE, O8, O/E, etc? I know that they start at noon and that another tourney starts at 7pm, so given the structure, I'm thinking about five hours. Correct?
Honestly no clue, but I would take the over on five hours. That's only 10 levels and unless it only gets like 15 runners (highly doubtful) it will go longer than 10 levels. They will run more than one tourney at once as upstairs isn't really that crowded on non-weekends/ holiday
Quote
07-07-2016 , 12:27 PM
World Poker Tour schedule in Sept-Oct posted on twitter.

https://www.marylandlivecasino.com/a...PokerPTr10.pdf
Quote
07-07-2016 , 01:45 PM
Yesterday's LO8 tourney wrapped up shortly before 7pm. Only 31 runners. Thought the dealers were really nitty enforcing rules such as out of turn play and cell phone use - obvious unintentional errors by players. Then we got to the final table and it was like the NBA Finals - what rules? Otherwise a fun time for what is one buy in for most low limit cash games.
Quote
07-07-2016 , 03:24 PM
Out of turn play has been a real problem in tournaments in the past and Live's dealers have been instructed to enforce the rules consistently. Same rules are enforced at Shoe, equally consistently.
Quote
07-07-2016 , 04:35 PM
Agree but my point was that it wasn't being enforced consistently. During first level a reg in #6 takes chips and taps top of chipstack, newbie in #7 (had poker book with him - think that is a tell) takes that as a check and bets. Reg says he didn't act and Newbie gets 3 hand penalty. I was in #8 and said it was a check by #6. Supervisor ignores.

Later at Final Table Button hides cards and SB calls out of turn. SB takes back call and no penalty is enforced. Dealer said he wasn't looking - Supervisor is standing behind dealer - O's game is on TV.
Quote
07-07-2016 , 05:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anytwo72
Agree but my point was that it wasn't being enforced consistently. During first level a reg in #6 takes chips and taps top of chipstack, newbie in #7 (had poker book with him - think that is a tell) takes that as a check and bets. Reg says he didn't act and Newbie gets 3 hand penalty. I was in #8 and said it was a check by #6. Supervisor ignores.

Later at Final Table Button hides cards and SB calls out of turn. SB takes back call and no penalty is enforced. Dealer said he wasn't looking - Supervisor is standing behind dealer - O's game is on TV.
My experience has been that the rules are enforced to the extent that the dealers/floors want to enforce them - which seems to vary widely from shift to shift.
Quote
07-07-2016 , 05:21 PM
My experience is that rules are enforced inversely proportional to the extent that an O's game is on the TV.
Quote
07-14-2016 , 08:34 AM
just wanted to give a quick shout out to mike to acknowledge how great the HORSE tournament was run yesterday. ended up with 42 runners, great structure that really gave everyone enough time to play and then didn't escalate too quickly. unfortunately i got knocked out in about 14th place, but it was still 6 hours well spent and an enjoyable time.
Quote
07-14-2016 , 10:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anytwo72
Yesterday's LO8 tourney wrapped up shortly before 7pm. Only 31 runners. Thought the dealers were really nitty enforcing rules such as out of turn play and cell phone use - obvious unintentional errors by players. Then we got to the final table and it was like the NBA Finals - what rules? Otherwise a fun time for what is one buy in for most low limit cash games.
Just my opinion but the three hand penalty for action out of turn without any warning is anything but fun. This is not the wsop. Its not a bunch of pros and dreamers trying to get a ring or a bracelet. These are low buy in rec geared daily tournaments. Please stop giving recs and newbies a reason not to come back!
Quote
07-14-2016 , 11:09 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pk_nuts
Just my opinion but the three hand penalty for action out of turn without any warning is anything but fun. This is not the wsop. Its not a bunch of pros and dreamers trying to get a ring or a bracelet. These are low buy in rec geared daily tournaments. Please stop giving recs and newbies a reason not to come back!
Disagree. I think this ruling has been very consistent and becomes more important as the tournament gets into later levels. For tournaments, the rules need to applied and applied consistently from beginning to end.
Quote
07-14-2016 , 06:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hunt4Sky
Disagree. I think this ruling has been very consistent and becomes more important as the tournament gets into later levels. For tournaments, the rules need to applied and applied consistently from beginning to end.
You're confusing consistency with severity. 3 hand penalty is rather severe (Horseshoe is one hand, Borgata is 'please don't do it again'). No one is arguing against consistent application of penalties. One hand seems fair, given that most 'fold out of turns' occur because a another player's cards are partially/fully hidden. i.e., purely an accident, as opposed to an overt act of irresponsibility. One hand gets the message across, three hands usually irritates the offender. Since tournament participation seems to be down; why irritate players unnecessarily? Good grief; there is already enough about playing poker to get irritated about!
Quote
07-14-2016 , 11:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by avalon88
You're confusing consistency with severity. 3 hand penalty is rather severe (Horseshoe is one hand, Borgata is 'please don't do it again'). No one is arguing against consistent application of penalties. One hand seems fair, given that most 'fold out of turns' occur because a another player's cards are partially/fully hidden. i.e., purely an accident, as opposed to an overt act of irresponsibility. One hand gets the message across, three hands usually irritates the offender. Since tournament participation seems to be down; why irritate players unnecessarily? Good grief; there is already enough about playing poker to get irritated about!
If the offender is irritated, perhaps he won't do it again.

In the instance where a player is hiding his cards, it is THAT player who should be given a penalty.
Quote
07-15-2016 , 12:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anytwo72

takes chips and taps top of chipstack,
To me the severity of the penalty pales in comparison with the ruling that the player committed some infraction by interpreting the above as a check.
Quote
07-15-2016 , 08:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rapini
In the instance where a player is hiding his cards, it is THAT player who should be given a penalty.
I agree, but unfortunately, this is not the case. I played in a tournament here recently and during level 1, a player acted out of turn. The player to his right had his hands completely over his cards and no one saw that he still had cards. After the hand, when the dealer was explaining what happened to the supervisor, he even said that the the player had his hands over his cards. The acting out of turn player got a penalty, but none for the other player.
Quote
07-15-2016 , 10:52 AM
Saw the same in a tournament. Seat 7 has his hands completely covering his cards. Seat 8 (who is clearly an inexperienced player) mucks and is given a penalty. Seat 8 later would sometimes pause with an annoyed "Is it on me? I don't want to act out of turn"

Seat 7 wasn't hiding his cards exactly but they also weren't visible. If seat 8 is following the action he could have known that 7 hadn't acted. Seemed to me a little verbal warning to both would have been more appropriate. And in particular to seat 7 "Sir if you hide your cards and cause a player to act out of turn behind you, you'll be assessed a penalty"
Quote

      
m