Quote:
Originally Posted by MDPokerAA
This is MD Live's rule, but ONLY for timed games (5/10 NL, 5/5 PLO and higher), and ONLY if the player who was away (who would have been UTG had he not left) had NOT missed his blinds yet.
The reason is that at MD Live - in timed games - players who are away from the table, but have not yet missed their blinds, still get dealt hands until they get a missed blind button. The rule actually makes sense in that case.
I was playing a timed game last night where everyone was straddling. The player who would have been up for the straddle UTG was getting up for a few minutes and SPECIFICALLY REQUESTED TO BE DEALT OUT (even though he hadn't missed a blind yet), so that the player to his left could still straddle. The dealer said, "anything for you!", then proceeded to deal this player in. I asked the dealer what was going on, and he said that he is REQUIRED to deal this player in, even if the player requested not be be dealt in. The supervisor came over and confirmed this was the right decision.
I was confounded by this decision and asked what the rationale would be. The supervisor said that otherwise, players would manipulate this loophole to sustain the straddle. I was like, yeah, that was the whole point, and what's the harm in that? What's the downside of allowing a player to be dealt out if he specifically requests it?