Quote:
Originally Posted by isaacicic
I have an idea. They can straddle to raise the stake and only pay 100 capped rake instead of 200.
You are quite right. Didn't think from that angle. Perhaps this will set Bo and dodgy1 thinking about countering such play.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoDiddleyMacau
So did these guys all get an option, or did only the original straddle ($40) get an option?
Yes they all get an option.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quorthon
My first instinct would be to leave that table immediately because they are in effect making it a higher limit table while you are still handicapped by the max. buy-in. If you are a good short stacker this could be OK but judging by their stack sizes they are destroying all comers and quite possibly playing from a combined roll as a team.
agreed. Initially I too thought of adopting a short stack strategy. In fact the American did exactly before I had an opportunity. He ended up losing 2 x $1K buy-in in a single orbit (each time against a different guy from that group). It was then I decided it was probably -EV play bcos
(a) With their option, they can choose 1 or more better hands to re-raise or shove me into a pre-flop coin-flip. (assuming they are colluding ... and I am leaning towards that as I saw them did the same thing the next day).
(b) posting less than the standard straddle, I get less value even if they all fold to my pf raise (which had to be super agressive) or shove.
(c) I will not get enough premium hand to play against 4 guys with position on me and a stack of just 37.5BB ($3000 max buy-in vis-a-vis their re-re-straddle).
Quote:
Originally Posted by dodgy1
To clarifly: Single straddle is standard practice at GL. I have not seen any cases of multiple straddles being allowed although blind raises in the dark do occur from time to time.
Thanks. So is it not allowed or you just haven't seen one?