Quote:
Originally Posted by Doctor Futtock
I tried to be as clear as possible and leave nothing out with my explanation. The floor went on about "fair play and the good spirit of the game" and all that but unless you want to share those "series of events" of which you speak, this comment doesn't really help.
Well, I think the only thing that needs to change for this to not particularly obvious is the way in which he says "115", which is really difficult to judge.
Imagine you're the dealer, and you see that player A is really clearly trying to see how much player B has, and player B says a number (which coincidentally is the size of his stack), it's not unreasonable to think that he is trying to help B out by giving his stack size. I'm not saying that player B couldn't have made it more obvious or that he definitely isn't angle shooting, but from a third perspective, it really isn't obvious that you're not angle shooting either. I understand that the way that things happened seem obvious to you, but you've got a third party (the dealer), who has to relay the message to a fourth party (the floor), and if you gave me all of the above information, I may well rule similarly.
It's worth noting that, as day'n'night suggests, you're partly to blame by not waiting for clarification of the bet. We get ourselves so worked up about slowrolling, but nobody in the world is going to care that you've taken a few seconds to ascertain whether it was a bet or not. Whether this was an honest mistake or an angle, you protect yourself by clarifying with the dealer.