Quote:
Originally Posted by joboggi
This is the new new new math.
Lower the rake and they will come.
meh, obviously I would be in favor of a lower rake, but that example was lulz...If you wanted to do apples to apples you would do buy-in structure, as well as the fact that hours are going to be roughly similar in the two games unless one has a much deeper buy-in structure (due to the increased win-rates when a fish makes a 500BB mistake) (so to make up numbers to fit my argument 20/hr at 1/3 -7 rake = 13/hr and 19/hr at 1/2-6 =13hr) ...the rake is going to be high in 1/2-1/3 games unless you are in Vegas.
As for the Casino, I made my first trip up last night and enjoyed it, the room is nice and the staff friendly. While some are new overall I felt that they did a good job. I actually liked the room better than MD Live as far as ambiance, and at the end of the day (early AM) we had a very live table at 2/5 so no complaints as far as action. With that said, I don't know if I would make the extra 15 min past their competitor from VA (I'm lazy what can I say). Let's all just be happy that we are not stuck in an attic in WV where (at the time) the casino was the only game in town and didn't care about players.