Quote:
Originally Posted by FiveTenMan
Brian, what would be the ruling if:
Player says he wants $200 added to his stack for a total of $300. Runner says $200 behind. Player goes all in without $200 being delivered, is he obligated to the entire $300? Or is it a gentleman's agreement? Can Player B (if he lost of course) not agree to pay out additional $200?
What if Player is coloring up and chips are in transit? Are those chips in play or per gentleman's agreement (both sides)?
Thanks
Yes, players are "playing behind" if money was out before the cards were dealt and it was announced that the player is $x.xx behind. The idea of "gentlemen's agreement" does not enter into it. If that player goes all-in, his bet is what's in front of him PLUS what's behind him. Same goes for coloring up, the chips are still in his stack.
P.S. I saw your other link to the Parx thread and from my experience, no, Parx does not permit players to "play behind" or be dealt in without physical chips in front of them. I played there myself and was caught a little offguard by it when I went busto, pulled out $200 and the dealer wouldn't deal me in (another player sold me chips from his pocket so I did get a hand). I'm not sure how any other PA casinos handle this situation. I suppose it either has to do with the casino's interpretation of the PGCB regulations, or just a matter of personal preference on the part of management . (Of course, now that I know, I just buy extra green at initial buy-in, so it's not a problem I just wasn't expecting it.)