Quote:
Originally Posted by plzd0nate
short stacking is one of the main reasons y 1-2 can suck. so now your doing what makes the games bad at 2-5 lol
Quote:
Originally Posted by plzd0nate
i don't think u see the point being presented. u complain about 1-2 being bad and u do something to make 2-5 bad. you are doing the same thing as ppl at 1-2 they don't feel comfortable playing for 200 so they buy in for 60
Quote:
Originally Posted by LiveActionPro
Lol Donni, pretty bad you get mad at 1-2 for bad games, when you KNOW your doing something that all players hate the MOST. I'd rather have slow play with big stacks in play than fast play with short stacks.
I totally disagree. Short stacked players at the 1/2 NL games are for the most part just inexperienced, recreational players. In the long run all that money will go to the more skilled players at 1/2 NL.
I would contend that these short stacked players are great for the Hollywood poker room. They help keep a steady flow of easy money into the games, the 1/2 NL games in particular.
Would you really rather play with only skilled, experienced players with $300 or more? I know I would prefer to play with novice players who will make a plethora of mistakes that I can exploit, even if they are only playing a short stack. At $60-$80 a pop, it adds up rather quickly.
If you guys can't beat the short stackers, including those at 2/5 NL, you aren't making the proper adjustments to your own games. Please dont complain about something that is in actuality very good for the overall ecology of the poker room.