Quote:
Originally Posted by dickwiggle
I'm sick of the ad hominem attacks by you. If anyone deserves banned it is someone who posts crap like that that doesn't contribute to the discussion of this casino's poker room and how to make it better/its finer qualities. Get off this thread troll!!!
lol djj is one of the better posters in here. He always has a level head and can fathom the long term picture of what would be good for the room. Find some other person to single out if you want a leg to stand on about trolling. To be honest, you seem like you might be a bit socially awkward in a certain way that I can't put a finger on. It doesn't invalidate your opinions themselves, but the way you are communicating them seems a bit off and it's definitely hurting the way your posts are being received by readers.
You seem to have a problem with people having input to the room management that benefits their own personal needs, but you have no problem with wanting to express your wants and needs (smoking), even though if they allowed that, it would be a negative impact on the room. It's a bit hypocritical to say that BOKE's ideas, which haven't even been defined or discussed since you showed up here, should not be allowed because he has stated that they would be of personal benefit to himself, and then for you to go on and on and on about smoking. Smoking would benefit a very small minority and it would drive many many people away. It would be harmful to the long term of the room and they should never do it, state law or not.
As for your ideas about these "secret meetings", these meetings SHOULD be with regs and not just a random selection of randoms in the room at any given time. As someone I just spoke to recently said about longevity of a poker room, "regulars are how games get started and how you ensure that there are always games running". If there are no regs, when the casual player strolls in, there may not be a game going at that exact time. 30 players might show up up one at a time over the course of several hours at 20 minute intervals, as opposed to them all showing up within a 5 minute window together. If the games aren't going with a few open seats here and there, the casual player isn't going to sit around and wait. They're going to come back another day (if at all). If that process repeats itself, the casual player will stop trying because there's never a game going. Obviously everyone here knows this stuff but the point is that the regulars are needed for the life of the room.
The problem with any group meeting between management and the regulars is that the goals of each party involved are not in line with each other. The goals of the room are "make the most money for the room", while the goals of the players are "make the most money for my own personal wallet". I'm sure it's great for the management to hear a bunch of ideas on how to cater to the regulars. The problem though, is that the regulars' ideas are not generally tailored to what will be good for the long term life of the room, which is truly what they SHOULD be thinking about. Too many ideas and thought processes are geared around "what can I do to make more money today" instead of "how can I make sure this place is around for years to come".
I don't want to start another discussion on the capped vs uncapped and minimum buy-ins and 100% rule, etc. I just wanted to point out why the meeting SHOULD be with regs. It's up to the room and management though, to decide how they want to use that feedback to benefit the room, while trying to do what they can to keep the regs happy.
They need the regs more than they know, but at the same time, they can't cater to them 100% because what the regs want doesn't necessarily line up with what the room itself wants.
I know this probably seems like a bunch of rambling. It's what I do =P
Last edited by ReidLockhart; 03-10-2014 at 10:45 PM.