Quote:
Originally Posted by donniccolo
One could also make the case that it is good for the game in the sense that theres always the same min $ in the pot (no dead SB). This way a late pos player isn't robbed of 33% of the pot preflop.
Why has the comment responding to this been removed?
It is a silly rule. It includes the sub-rule that a player, having missed his BB, and having the SB bust on the same hand, can't buy the button, when the pot would be right from buying the button.
Being "robbed" as a late position player of 33% of the pot (i.e. the sb) is a laughable defense of this thing. This rule is odd, and the only justification given so far is even more odd, while the simplest response to hat justification was removed? Huh?