Quote:
Originally Posted by JStunna
If Player A had already folded, I don't get how anything he had done afterwards could constitute action. I was under the impression that folding supersedes any action that follows it.
It is supposed to be angle prevention, I think. ie: Two player team, player raises, team member 1 3 bets, team member 2 throws his cards in then pushes chips forward to indicate huge raise. Original raiser folds, team takes down the pot with a "raise" that was never a raise.
I still don't agree with it, because in that scenario the team still wins since the original raiser is folding anyways, so the chips are just being sent to a different member of the team or the forced raise is just being shipped to the first team member. I doubt you'd see a floor rule it this way unless they already suspect collusion and somebody put up a stink.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JStunna
If the bet was 200, and you put out 275, wouldn't that be a call? I thought you had to put out 50% more than the bet to indicate a raise, so if you had put out 300, then you would've been obligated to put out an extra 100 to meet the minimum raise to 400.
Unless that's all your chips, then you're all in.