Quote:
Originally Posted by lv.77
Ok. No problem. I was just wondering because for days I've seen people complaining about charity rooms. Now I see why people still go, because nothing else is legal.
Sent from my Z970 using Tapatalk
As many of said, the charity rooms get action because of their location. They're in the suburbs and people can avoid the 20-50 minute drive to the downtown casinos (or worse if you're sitting in rush hour or construction traffic to get home).
If someone built a casino in Livonia/Farmington/Novi and one in Auburn Hills/Troy/Rochester, you'd see many of the charity rooms out of business. Not all of them, but they'd get significantly less action. All the time, you hear people in the charity rooms say they play there because they "didn't want to drive downtown." You also get some worse players, more social players, in the charity rooms for the same reason. If you can go five minutes from home and play it's much less commitment than driving into downtown Detroit.
I've always said the land where the Palace of Auburn Hills is located would be a fantastic place for someone to build a casino, but I can guarantee the 3 casinos downtown would do everything in their power to try to block this from happening (the same way they maintained the ability to smoke in the casinos even though the rest of the state is smoke free in any business). In Auburn Hills, you'd get all the Troy/Rochester/Shelby gamblers. You'd also add in the Birmingham/Bloomfield Hills crowd (assuming it's done right). You'd attract such a large market of decent money (Oakland county at one point was one of the top 3 most affluent counties in the United States..it's dropped a little but there's still a lot of money). You'd also get all the Flint gambling traffic that would stop there instead of driving 30 miles farther to get into downtown.