Quote:
Originally Posted by IDKMyBFFJill
If you have a 28bb/hour win rate and actually play 500hrs, then I question why you aren't moving up to 5/10.
And sample size has to be greater than 500 hours due to the depth of the player field. More players, more hours need to be played to actually establish a win rate.
interesting theory imo
but aren't you concerned that this voodoo you're talking won't apply to live poker because live poker is so different?
i mean for example, let's say i started this year on a really bad run --but i was playing live-- no one would be the wiser if i just started counting my winrate from march, because live poker is 200% bull****, nobody can prove anything because what, do you got eyes everywhere or something?
so why even keep logs? that's just evidence of your own lies. you'll remember it. or who cares, whatever, **** poker anyway i wasn't even trying hard.